2027 洛杉矶北美华人 HR 新年论坛 · 1 月 2 日,第一阶段优惠票 12 月 1 日截止立即报名 →
北美华人人力资源协会
用工合规 · 观点

National Advertising Division Finds Certain Deel Payroll and HRIS Claims Supported; Recommends Others be Modified or Discontinued

2024-08-10 · NACSHR · 阅读约 15 分钟
要点速读 · KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • 应竞争对手Rippling的挑战,BBB全国项目下属国家广告部(NAD)审查了Deel薪资与HRIS产品的多项广告声明,结果于2024年8月8日公布。
  • NAD认定Deel“每年节省高达$20,000”及配套对比图、“行业领先的全球薪资软件”两项声明有合理依据,不属虚假或误导。
  • NAD建议Deel明确界定“本地化”“内部运营”薪资的含义,并说明与Rippling的比较涵盖其EOR服务所在国家。
  • 因缺乏证据,NAD建议停用“全球HR市场领导者”“#1全球HR平台”“团队更偏好Deel而非Rippling”等说法。
  • 关于合规与客服,NAD要求Deel停止暗示Rippling缺乏法律专家网络或不合规,并修改“客服比Rippling更快”的声明;Deel表示将遵守裁决。

AI 根据原文整理,以发布日期为准(2024-08-10)

本文目录(6 节)
BBB全国项目的国家广告部(NAD)对Deel公司在其薪资和人力资源信息系统(HRIS)方面的广告声明进行了审查,回应了竞争对手Rippling提出的挑战。NAD认为,Deel的部分声明,如“每年节省高达$20,000”和“行业领先的全球薪资软件”是有依据的。然而,NAD建议修改或停止某些其他声明,特别是关于与Rippling的比较、法律合规性和客户支持的声明。NAD认为,Deel的“本地化”和“内部运营”薪资服务声明需要进一步澄清,并建议调整对Rippling的比较方式。此外,NAD要求停止使用“全球HR市场领导者”的称号,因为没有确凿证据支持这一说法。Deel已表示将遵守NAD的决定,进一步确保其广告的真实性和透明度。此次审查反映了NAD对广告真实性的持续关注,确保消费者能够获得准确的信息,同时促进公平竞争。

In a challenge brought by competitor People Center, Inc. d/b/a Rippling, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that Deel, Inc., in connection with its Payroll and Human Resource Information System (HRIS), provided a reasonable basis for certain claims, including Deel’s “save up to $20,000 per year” claim and accompanying chart, as well as the claim that Deel has an “industry leading global payroll software.”

New York, NY, Aug. 08, 2024 -- In a challenge brought by competitor People Center, Inc. d/b/a Rippling, BBB National Programs’ National Advertising Division determined that Deel, Inc., in connection with its Payroll and Human Resource Information System (HRIS), provided a reasonable basis for certain claims, including Deel’s “save up to $20,000 per year” claim and accompanying chart, as well as the claim that Deel has an “industry leading global payroll software.”

However, the National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended that Deel modify or discontinue certain other claims, including comparative claims versus Rippling’s native payroll software, legal compliance, and customer support.

The parties are human resources and payroll service providers that offer multiple services.

Native and In-House Payroll Claims

Rippling challenged claims about “native” and “in-house” payroll systems that appeared in charts on Deel’s website:

  • “Payroll service is native and operated in-house in every country – Deel ✓, Rippling X”
  • “Payroll service is native and operated in-house in every country – Deel ✓ Yes, Rippling X No, they currently use partners in some countries.
The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that customers could reasonably take away the message that native payroll includes native payroll software. Further, customers may reasonably take away the message that Rippling does not offer in-house and native payroll in all the countries in which it offers global payroll (outside of employer of record).

Therefore, NAD recommended that Deel modify these claims by clearly and conspicuously defining what “native” means and clarifying that the comparison with Rippling also includes countries where they offer payroll as part of their employer of record services.

Industry-Leading Payroll Claim

Deel claims on its website to have “[i]ndustry leading global payroll software” and, in a smaller font, “Deel is a leader in multi-country payroll and contractor payments, according to G2 user reviews.”

The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that the phrase “global payroll software” means that Deel offers payroll software globally—whether that is in-house or through a third-party. Further, NAD considered the language and the context in which the “industry leading” language appears and concluded the claim does not convey a superlative message. Consumers are likely to take away the message that Deel is among the top in the industry, but not necessarily the best.

Since the record indicates that Deel has significant revenue, market presence, and a large global footprint, and there is no dispute that Deel and Rippling are among the many leaders in the global payroll market, NAD concluded that this claim was not false or misleading.

HRIS Comparative Claims

Rippling challenged claims on Deel’s website that customers can “[s]witch to Deel HR and save up to $20,000 per year.” An accompanying chart below the claim lists seven product features with Rippling and Deel displaying checkmarks for each feature. The chart states that Deel is “Free for companies with less than 200 employees” while Rippling costs “$8 employee/month.”

The National Advertising Division (NAD) concluded that because both products offer the touted features, it is not misleading to characterize Deel’s software as having those product features and that the product comparison chart is not misleading.

HRIS Superlative Claims

The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that there was no evidence in the record to support an unqualified claim that Deel is #1 in the market. Therefore, NAD recommended that Deel discontinue the claims:

  • “The market leader in the Global HR space.”
  • “Build confidence in your compliance with the #1 Global HR platform.”
Preference Claim

The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that data relied on by Deel is not a good fit for its claim that “Teams prefer Deel over Rippling for global HR and Payroll” because it did not indicate a preference for one product over another. Accordingly, NAD recommended that the claim be discontinued.

Compliance Claims

Rippling challenged claims about legal compliance that appeared in charts on Deel’s website:

  • “Network of 200+ local legal hiring experts around the world -- ✓ Yes, Rippling X No”
  • “Compliance document collection for contractors, on top of EOR, constantly reviewed and updated.”
The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that in context it is reasonable to take away the message that Rippling has an inferior network of legal experts around the world, and it does not offer compliance document collection. Since Deel submitted no evidence in support of these two claims, NAD recommended it discontinue the comparative part of these claims as they relate to Rippling and cease conveying the messages that there are legal risks associated with using Rippling products and that Rippling’s products are not compliant.

NAD noted that nothing in its decision would prevent Deel from advertising its network of local legal hiring experts or comparing its compliance services to Rippling’s so long as they do not claim that Rippling lacks a network of 200+ local legal hiring experts around the world or compliance document collection for contractors.

Customer Support Claims

The National Advertising Division (NAD) determined that the comparative claim that Rippling does not offer multi-channel support is not false or misleading.

However, NAD concluded that the unqualified claim, “Deel’s support is in-house, reliable, and faster than Rippling” is not supported and recommended that it be discontinued or modified to make clear the circumstances and times when its support would be faster and avoid conveying the message that Rippling’s customer support is unreliable.

Further, NAD determined that Deel’s claim “Same level of service in every country with centralized communications – Deel ✓ Yes, Rippling X No, as they use partners in some places,” is not supported because there is no evidence about the level of service provided by Rippling in any country. Therefore, NAD recommended that the claim be discontinued.

During the proceeding Deel permanently discontinued and modified certain claims. Therefore, NAD did not review these claims on their merits and will treat the claims, for compliance purposes, as though NAD recommended they be discontinued.

In its advertiser statement, Deel stated that it will comply with NAD’s decision.

All BBB National Programs case decision summaries can be found in the case decision library. For the full text of NAD, NARB, and CARU decisions, subscribe to the online archive. This press release shall not be used for advertising or promotional purposes.

About BBB National Programs: BBB National Programs, a non-profit organization, is the home of U.S. independent industry self-regulation, currently operating more than a dozen globally recognized programs that have been helping enhance consumer trust in business for more than 50 years. These programs provide third-party accountability and dispute resolution services that address existing and emerging industry issues, create a fairer playing field for businesses, and a better experience for consumers. BBB National Programs continues to evolve its work and grow its impact by providing business guidance and fostering best practices in arenas such as advertising, child-and-teen-directed marketing, data privacy, dispute resolution, automobile warranty, technology, and emerging areas. To learn more, visit bbbprograms.org.

About the National Advertising Division: The National Advertising Division of BBB National Programs provides independent self-regulation and dispute resolution services, guiding the truthfulness of advertising across the U.S. The National Advertising Division reviews national advertising in all media and its decisions set consistent standards for advertising truth and accuracy, delivering meaningful protection to consumers and leveling the playing field for business.

每周用工合规要点,周一送到邮箱精选北美用工合规、签证移民、福利保险、招聘与 AI 资讯,外加 NACSHR 活动和会员服务。

每周一封,免费,随时可以退订。提交后请到邮箱点确认。

读完之后,你可能需要

相关文章

第一次负责 PEO / EOR Exit?NACSHR发布HR实操指南2026-10-15不到一年第二次站上联邦陪审团法庭:SHRM这次因“服务犬+撤回Offer”被告2026-10-072027美国税率预测出炉:美国HR现在需要知道什么?税率没有简单“上涨”,真正变化的是收入门槛2026-09-14

相关最新进展

更多 →
  1. 10-26 06:48【美国】HR 科技公司 TalentNeuron 推出 AI 生成部门结构功能
  2. 10-26 02:57【联邦】11 月 1 日美国夏令时结束 薪酬团队需计入多出一小时工资
  3. 10-24 21:00【佛州】最低工资上调至每小时15美元,已从9月30日起生效