• 快讯
    Why AI is now HR’s business Could the AI revolution also herald a revolution in HR? Generative AI is leaving many businesses in a fix. On the one hand, the potential of the technology is strikingly obvious. Since ChatGPT debuted to the public in late 2022, AI has made extraordinary advances. Coding tools can spin up micro apps from a simple prompt. Chatbots can produce instantaneous research. Video models can create studio-grade clips. Tools like these can supercharge all kinds of work, whether it’s helping create a whole marketing campaign or simply assisting an individual reason through a thorny problem. One estimate sizes the corporate opportunity at $4.4 trillion globally. Yet it can be bewilderingly hard for enterprises to realize those gains. Studies show that generative AI is having limited impact on productivity. Many organizations find themselves either stuck in pilot purgatory, or rolling out initiatives that fail to deliver ROI. Others don't even know where to start. This issue is especially pronounced for smaller enterprises. In fact, research suggests that AI is seen as the number-one challenge by four out of five small business leaders in the UK. Small firms are half as likely to have implemented it compared to larger companies. And within the small companies that have adopted AI, usage is often uneven. Seventy three percent of senior managers use it at least once a month, compared with only 32 percent of entry-level employees. This creates what Kevin Fitzgerald, UK Managing Director of the all-in-one employment platform Employment Hero, calls the “AI advantage gap.” “AI is only delivering productivity gains for some, and that’s a huge problem,” he says. “For technology to drive meaningful change, it needs to be in the hands of everyone.” Human resources (HR) departments are uniquely positioned to help manage some of the challenges around AI adoption. That’s because taking full advantage of the new AI tools available to organizations is more than just an IT project. “AI is all about job redesign, new skills, new organization structures, and new roles for leaders,” says Josh Bersin, a respected HR industry analyst and CEO of HR consultancy The Josh Bersin Company. “HR people are essential as part of companies’ AI transformations.” In practice, this kind of project tends to be easier for smaller businesses, which have fewer employees and less organizational complexity to disrupt. Bersin says that Chief Human Resources Officers (CHROs) now frequently lead AI-based organizational redesigns. Going further, almost two thirds of IT decision-makers expect their HR and IT teams to merge in the next five years, according to a recent survey. This is already happening at companies such as Moderna, the biotech firm with more than 5,000 employees, which now has a single leader covering both. “HR has a once-in-a-generation opportunity to reshape the future of work,” says Fitzgerald. “And it’s important to get this right. Bad AI rollouts can slash personal productivity in half.” So what does HR-led transformation look like in practice? Here we spotlight three ways HR leaders can set their organization up for AI success… 1. HR as pioneers Leading on AI transformation means deeply understanding training needs, integration challenges, employee resistance and—fundamentally—how and where AI offers value. This means HR professionals need real experience of those things themselves. There are many HR tasks to which both traditional machine learning and generative AI is well suited. Much of the press buzz is around recruitment—using AI to source candidates, screen CVs, and automate parts of the application process—but its impact can be much broader. The creative and communication side of the job is a natural fit for the capabilities of large language models (LLMs), which excel both in summarizing and expressing information. Whether it’s drafting job descriptions, communicating complicated policies in plain language, or managing the team’s internal knowledge, there’s plenty that an LLM can help with (so long as it offers appropriate privacy assurances). There are a range of options for deployment, from buying tools that package up an LLM for delivering on a specific use case—such as offering AI training programs or building FAQ chatbots—to simply subscribing to a frontier AI assistant like ChatGPT. The most immediate benefit is the potential gains for the HR team itself. Handing off repetitive tasks to AI can free up time. But it’s also the baseline for any HR team that is planning on leading the way in a business’ AI transformation, because credibility will be vital. That’s not to say that it should only be HR leading the charge on AI—Bersin says that more often than not having a dedicated committee with representatives from HR, legal, and IT is most effective—but it’s a necessary criterion for playing a central role. “It’s about leading by example,” says Fitzgerald. “People don’t want technology forced on them—they want to see its benefits, and be given the freedom and encouragement to explore it.” Of course, much of HR’s AI usage will be internally facing, so there’s a comms job to be done. “My advice to the HR leader would therefore be: share,” says Fitzgerald. “Share the wins that you've had, and actually put them out there to the broader business.” 2. HR as culture definers Establishing the right culture around AI is vital. “It’s the missing link in AI adoption,” says Deepali Vyas, Global Head of Data & AI at global talent advisory firm ZRG. There are two crucial reasons for this. The first is that when a company chooses to roll out AI, it can create ill feelings. People can fear it’s a prelude to cost cutting and job losses. Of course, an organization may be planning to downsize—but equally it could be planning to do more with the same number of people. Whatever the plan, be transparent. If nobody needs to worry about their jobs, tell them. If a restructure is likely, fair dealing and honesty can go a long way to attenuating resentment. HR has the authority and the skills to lead on conveying this information in the most effective and appropriate way. The second reason concerns “shadow AI.” This is where employees use AI tools of their own without telling management, either because they fear for their jobs or because they view AI as a shortcut and don’t want to pull back the curtain on how they get things done. Shadow AI is already widespread; the security firm Varonis estimates that up to 98 percent of employees use shadow AI or shadow IT in some capacity, with employees hiding their AI use out of fear of their employer's reaction. While the primary risks of shadow AI are to do with security and privacy, there is also a more systemic drawback. Top-down AI tool implementation can be important, but companies that don’t also tap into the wisdom of the crowd will miss out on AI opportunities. Generative chatbots are general-purpose tools with the most open-ended interface possible: there are countless different ways to use them, and the people best placed to figure out how this kind of AI can help your business are the people who work there. But you can’t enjoy the fruits of their experiments if they are unwilling to share how they’re using it and what they’re discovering as a result. “You really need to bring shadow AI use to the surface,” Vyas says. “In any case, banning or ignoring shadow AI is not going to make it disappear. It's only going to drive it further underground.” Bringing it out into the light is, again, a question of culture. If IT owns guardrails and platforms, and the C-suite owns vision and accountability, HR owns the people and behaviors piece. In addition to quelling fears that revealing AI usage will jeopardize jobs, HR needs to create forums to encourage sharing across all teams. This could take the form of workshops and hackathons or simply dedicated channels on Slack. There should also be incentives, so that individuals who come up with approaches that create meaningful value are well remunerated for their contributions. “There's a lot of fear versus empowerment,” says Vyas. “HR’s cultural mandate is building a culture of AI fluency, normalizing AI as a partner in work and to build trust around its use.” 3. HR as organization designers AI transformation is not just about rolling out the tools. You need teams with AI literacy, skills and mindsets—teams that are open to new ways of working and to reimagining workflows that have perhaps remained unchanged for decades. You may also need to create new roles like a Chief AI Officer, or hire specialist software developers. “It's about building that future-ready workforce,” says Vyas. HR’s expertise in recruitment and training will be crucial in this effort—only half of employees in SMEs believe their company has done a good job instilling technological know-how—and AI itself can play a powerful role in making a success of it. Forward-thinking organizations weave AI into workforce management, from how workers move internally to how they train and learn, Vyas says. “There’s personalized learning journeys, there's internal mobility recommendations, there's workforce planning tied to all of these business scenarios.” As they scale, companies may wish to rethink their org charts in light of AI. The traditional triangular org chart has been a mainstay since Brigadier General Daniel McCallum unveiled the first example in 1855. But many commentators believe that new architectures will coalesce to reflect how people work best with AI. Microsoft’s Work Trend Index Annual Report 2025 argues that the org chart will be replaced with a “Work Chart,” which it describes as “a dynamic, outcome-driven model where teams form around goals, not functions, powered by [AI] agents that expand employee scope and enable faster, more impactful ways of working.” In practice this means a flatter, more flexible operating model. Firms that have harnessed AI in this way report having more satisfied, more optimistic employees. HR will need to play a pivotal role in managing any such transformation. “That’s not only because most savvy HR leaders are also very good at change enablement,” says Bersin, “but also because this clearly would have implications for pay models, reward systems, and leadership pipeline.” What’s more, Microsoft argues that in a Work Chart world, orchestrating the interplay between humans and AI agents—and getting the balance right—is going to be an emerging area of responsibility for HR. In discharging this duty, they will need to collaborate more closely than ever with technical teams. This shift may seem radical. But, as the aphorism has it, it's easy to underestimate the long-term effects of new technologies. Vyas believes this kind of business architecture will just be “the new normal—and sooner than we might think”.   原文:https://www.wired.com/sponsored/story/employment-hero-why-ai-is-now-hrs-business/
    快讯
    2025年11月28日
  • 快讯
    加州一家人力资源外包用工公司因挪用就业税被起诉,涉案金额超 9000 万美元 美国司法部于 2025 年 11 月 20 日宣布,位于加州橙县的一家外包用工公司负责人及多名相关人员因涉嫌大规模就业税欺诈被捕。根据官方披露的起诉书,从 2020 年到 2025 年,这些公司系统性地扣留临时工的联邦就业税,却未将税款上缴美国财政部,而是被挪用于购买豪宅、豪车与进行奢华旅行。司法部确认的总损失超过 9000 万美元,其中仅就业税申报部分即被少报超过 4400 万美元。 美国司法部近日宣布,加州一家具有人力资源外包与派遣业务的公司因涉嫌系统性挪用就业税而被联邦起诉。官方披露的起诉书显示,该公司及多名内部管理人员在过去五年中,通过隐瞒用工规模、瞒报工资数据、少申报或不申报代扣就业税等方式,使美国财政部蒙受超过 9000 万美元 的损失。 这是近年来美国劳务外包行业中金额最高、持续时间最长的单一就业税欺诈案件之一,亦成为监管部门重点关注的合规风险典型。 五年间系统性少缴就业税,造成重大财政损失 根据司法部中央区(Central District of California)发布的信息,该人力资源外包公司自 2020 年起至 2025 年,长期在工资、工时与代扣税申报中实施系统性欺诈,包括: 少报工资总额 不报告代扣的联邦就业税 虚报或隐瞒实际派遣工人数 使用现金支付规避税务 雇佣未经授权的工人,降低被 IRS 发现的可能性 起诉书指出,公司通过这些方式累计少缴超过 4400 万美元的联邦就业税,导致美国财政部(US Treasury)遭受超过 9000 万美元的综合损失。 司法部强调,代扣税款本应作为员工的社保税(Social Security Tax)、医疗保险税(Medicare Tax)以及联邦失业税的重要组成部分,一旦被企业挪用或不申报,将直接被认定为严重违法行为。 非法所得流向奢侈消费而非企业运营 联邦调查进一步显示,公司及其内部管理人员将大部分未缴税款用于非经营性支出,包括: 在加州多地购买高额住宅与地产 购买豪华车辆 进行多次高消费的国际旅行 用于私人活动与家庭相关开支 司法部指出,这类“将商业代扣税款用于个人奢侈用途”的行为,是税务欺诈案件中最严肃、最具刑事性质的证据链之一。 多人被起诉,面临最高 20 年监禁 本案并非普通税务违规,而是被司法部定性为 刑事税务欺诈案件。根据公开信息,公司内部多名管理人员已被逮捕或安排出庭,他们面临的指控包括: 电汇欺诈共谋(Wire Fraud Conspiracy) ——最高 20 年监禁 洗钱共谋(Money Laundering Conspiracy) ——最高 10 年监禁 多项未缴就业税指控(Failure to Pay Employment Taxes) ——每项最高 5 年监禁 目前案件仍处于联邦刑事司法程序中,尚未公布最终判决结果。 案件对企业 HR 的启示:合规是底线,不是选项 此次案件再次提醒企业管理层与 HR 部门:对于外包与派遣服务相关的薪酬、税务与用工合规,不能存在任何侥幸心理。 对企业 HR 的关键警示包括: 1)代扣就业税是监管高压线无论由企业或外包服务商负责,一旦出现挪用、少报或不报,都可能从民事违规直接升级为联邦刑事案件。 2)外包供应链透明度必须提升企业需确保外包伙伴具备合法合规的薪酬处理能力,必要时要求提供就业税申报证明(如 941 表)。 3)非法用工风险不可低估未经授权的劳工不仅导致移民法违规,还会放大税务风险,增加企业被联合调查的概率。 4)HR、财务与法务应建立交叉审核机制尤其是在使用大量派遣工、临时工或低时薪岗位时,更需要严格的合规监督。 近年来同类型案件频发,监管力度持续升级 除当前案件外,近几年美国各地也出现多起类似的就业税欺诈案件,包括: 南加州某劳务派遣公司少缴 4300 万美元就业税案(已判刑) 德州某临时用工公司因使用未经授权劳工并隐瞒工资被罚数千万美元 佛州某外包机构利用空壳公司逃避 FICA 与 FUTA 税款,最终认罪并被没收资产 这些案件呈现高度一致的风险模式:高现金流 + 大量临时工 + 不透明薪酬流程 + 家族式管理结构一旦出现违规,几乎必然引发 IRS 和司法部的联合刑事调查。 结语:对于企业而言,合规永远是最低成本的选择 本案不仅反映了美国劳务外包行业合规风险的复杂性,也提醒企业在选择外包合作伙伴时必须保持审慎。在美国监管环境持续收紧的背景下,“合规”已经从运营要求,变为企业稳健经营的战略基石。
    快讯
    2025年11月21日
  • 快讯
    401(k) limit increases to $24,500 for 2026, IRA limit increases to $7,500 WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service announced today that the amount individuals can contribute to their 401(k) plans in 2026 has increased to $24,500, up from $23,500 for 2025. The IRS today also issued technical guidance regarding all cost‑of‑living adjustments affecting dollar limitations for pension plans and other retirement-related items for tax year 2026 in Notice 2025-67 PDF, posted today on IRS.gov. Highlights of changes for 2026 The annual contribution limit for employees who participate in 401(k), 403(b), governmental 457 plans, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan is increased to $24,500, up from $23,500 for 2025. The limit on annual contributions to an IRA is increased to $7,500 from $7,000. The IRA catch‑up contribution limit for individuals aged 50 and over was amended under the SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 (SECURE 2.0) to include an annual cost‑of‑living adjustment is increased to $1,100, up from $1,000 for 2025. The catch-up contribution limit that generally applies for employees aged 50 and over who participate in most 401(k), 403(b), governmental 457 plans, and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan is increased to $8,000, up from $7,500 for 2025. Therefore, participants in most 401(k), 403(b), governmental 457 plans and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan who are 50 and older generally can contribute up to $32,500 each year, starting in 2026. Under a change made in SECURE 2.0, a higher catch-up contribution limit applies for employees aged 60, 61, 62 and 63 who participate in these plans. For 2026, this higher catch-up contribution limit remains $11,250 instead of the $8,000 noted above. The income ranges for determining eligibility to make deductible contributions to traditional Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs), to contribute to Roth IRAs and to claim the Saver’s Credit all increased for 2026. Taxpayers can deduct contributions to a traditional IRA if they meet certain conditions. If during the year either the taxpayer or the taxpayer’s spouse was covered by a retirement plan at work, the deduction may be reduced, or phased out, until it is eliminated, depending on filing status and income. (If neither the taxpayer nor the spouse is covered by a retirement plan at work, the phase-outs of the deduction do not apply.) Here are the phase‑out ranges for 2026: For single taxpayers covered by a workplace retirement plan, the phase-out range is increased to between $81,000 and $91,000, up from between $79,000 and $89,000 for 2025. For married couples filing jointly, if the spouse making the IRA contribution is covered by a workplace retirement plan, the phase-out range is increased to between $129,000 and $149,000, up from between $126,000 and $146,000 for 2025. For an IRA contributor who is not covered by a workplace retirement plan and is married to someone who is covered, the phase-out range is increased to between $242,000 and $252,000, up from between $236,000 and $246,000 for 2025. For a married individual filing a separate return who is covered by a workplace retirement plan, the phase-out range is not subject to an annual cost-of-living adjustment and remains between $0 and $10,000. Other phase-out ranges and limitations The notice also provides limitations for 2026 for Roth IRAs, the Saver’s Credit and SIMPLE retirement accounts. The income phase-out range for taxpayers making contributions to a Roth IRA is increased to between $153,000 and $168,000 for singles and heads of household, up from between $150,000 and $165,000 for 2025. For married couples filing jointly, the income phase-out range is increased to between $242,000 and $252,000, up from between $236,000 and $246,000 for 2025. The phase-out range for a married individual filing a separate return who makes contributions to a Roth IRA is not subject to an annual cost-of-living adjustment and remains between $0 and $10,000. The income limit for the Saver’s Credit (also known as the Retirement Savings Contributions Credit) for low- and moderate-income workers is $80,500 for married couples filing jointly, up from $79,000 for 2025; $60,375 for heads of household, up from $59,250 for 2025; and $40,250 for singles and married individuals filing separately, up from $39,500 for 2025. The amount individuals can generally contribute to their SIMPLE retirement accounts is increased to $17,000, up from $16,500 for 2025. Pursuant to a change made in SECURE 2.0, individuals can contribute a higher amount to certain applicable SIMPLE retirement accounts. For 2026, this higher amount is increased to $18,100, up from $17,600 for 2025. The catch-up contribution limit that generally applies for employees aged 50 and over who participate in most SIMPLE plans is increased to $4,000, up from $3,500 for 2025. Under a change made in SECURE 2.0, a different catch-up limit applies for employees aged 50 and over who participate in certain applicable SIMPLE plans, which remains $3,850. Under a change made in SECURE 2.0, a higher catch-up contribution limit applies for employees aged 60, 61, 62 and 63 who participate in SIMPLE plans, which remains $5,250. Details on these and other retirement-related cost-of-living adjustments for 2026 are in Notice 2025-67, available on IRS.gov. https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/401k-limit-increases-to-24500-for-2026-ira-limit-increases-to-7500
    快讯
    2025年11月14日
  • 快讯
    2026年通勤福利上限提高至每月340美元,员工全年可节税8,160美元 聊胜于无 美国国税局(IRS)近日正式公布了《Revenue Procedure 2025-32》,确定了2026纳税年度多项福利与税务调整,其中**通勤福利(Qualified Transportation Fringe Benefits)**的税前上限迎来上调。 根据最新规定,自2026年1月1日起,员工可通过雇主提供的通勤福利账户(Commuter Benefit Account)在税前支付通勤与停车费用,享受以下新上限: 公共交通与合乘通勤车辆(Transit & Vanpool):每月上限 340美元 合格停车(Qualified Parking):每月上限 340美元 与2025年的325美元相比,上调了15美元/月,涨幅约4.6%。这意味着员工每年可在交通部分节税最高 4,080美元,停车部分同样 4,080美元,两项合计可达8,160美元的税前抵扣额度。 对员工的意义:降低通勤成本、提升实际收入 通勤福利是一项可让员工在税前使用收入支付通勤开支的计划,常见支出包括地铁、公交、火车、轮渡、合乘通勤车辆费用,以及工作地点附近的合格停车场费用。随着返岗办公逐渐常态化,美国员工的通勤时间和成本持续上升。据多项市场调查显示,美国职场人士每年平均花费约6,000至7,000美元在通勤上。因此,新上限的调整,将帮助员工显著减轻税负压力,相当于每年“多拿”一笔免税补贴。 对雇主与HR的启示:应尽快完成制度与系统更新 IRS设定的通勤福利上限属于税法允许的最高免税额度,但并非强制要求雇主采纳。企业若希望员工受益,需主动在福利计划中进行更新。对于HR和薪酬福利负责人而言,2026年计划年度开始前,建议重点完成以下三项工作: 更新内部政策与计划文件确保福利手册、SPD(Summary Plan Description)及内部沟通文件反映新上限。 同步薪资系统与第三方供应商确认系统参数调整完成,避免因旧限额导致的税务申报错误。 加强员工沟通与教育在开放登记期(Open Enrollment)或内部简报中,清楚说明税前抵扣额度变化与操作方式,帮助员工最大化利用新政策。 从税收策略到人才体验:企业的双重价值 在竞争激烈的招聘市场中,优化通勤福利不仅是税务合规要求,更是提升员工体验与保留率的有效工具。IRS上调上限反映出通胀与通勤支出的现实变化,也为企业提供了通过福利创新改善“返岗体验”的契机。对推行混合办公或要求员工部分返岗的企业而言,增加通勤福利额度,能够有效缓解员工对交通成本的不满,从而提升组织氛围与信任度。 2026年的通勤福利上限调整,是IRS年度税务通胀调整中对职场群体最直接的利好之一。它让员工更灵活地管理税前收入,帮助企业以低成本提升员工满意度,也进一步体现了政府在通胀环境下对通勤支出的政策关注。无论是雇主还是员工,现在都是审视、更新、利用通勤福利计划的最佳时机。 资料来源:U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Revenue Procedure 2025-32, Section 4.16 “Qualified Transportation Fringe Benefit”, issued October 9, 2025.
    快讯
    2025年10月21日
  • 快讯
    NACSHR推出企业员工健康保险优选服务:助力企业提前布局2026福利方案 现在正是企业为 2026计划年度(Plan Year 2026) 审视和更新员工健康保险方案的关键时期。大多数企业的团体健康险计划都会在 2026年1月1日 生效,因此10–12月是比较报价、优化福利的黄金窗口。 企业无需支付任何费用,就能通过持牌经纪人获得多家主流保险公司的免费报价与对比。 让员工更满意,让企业更省心。 北美华人HR专业社群平台 NACSHR(North America Chinese Society of Human Resource) 今日正式宣布推出 “企业员工健康保险优选服务”,旨在帮助北美地区中小企业在人力成本上升与福利竞争加剧的背景下,提前优化2026计划年度(Plan Year 2026)的员工健康保险方案。 随着每年第四季度成为企业保险福利renewal季(Renewal Season),NACSHR将联合加州最大GA(General Agency)——Word & Brown,为企业提供免费、多渠道、多保险公司对比的团体健康保险报价服务。该服务覆盖 加州与德州 等主要市场,支持不同规模企业根据预算、员工结构和业务需求定制适合的福利方案。 员工保险一站式服务,企业零成本启动 通过本次推出的优选服务,企业主和HR可免费获得: 2026年员工健康保险免费报价 多家保险公司方案对比与专业建议 员工保障结构与成本优化指导 专属顾问一对一咨询 “企业在第四季度进行保险福利方案review,不仅是为了应对新年度的费率变化,更是提升员工满意度与留任率的关键时刻。”NACSHR优选平台负责人 Annie 表示,“我们希望通过这项服务,让中小企业能以零成本的方式获得专业支持,真正实现‘企业省钱、员工更安心’的双赢局面。” 聚焦2026 Renewal Season,专业团队全程服务 NACSHR的保险服务由持有保险经纪执照的专业团队负责,涵盖: 团体健康保险(Group Health) 牙科与视力保险(Dental & Vision) 人寿与伤残保障(Life & Disability) 员工福利设计与成本控制方案(Benefits Optimization) 该服务尤其适合 1–500人规模的企业,无论是否已有团体保险计划,均可通过NACSHR获得一对一评估与方案更新建议。 立即行动,提前锁定2026年最优方案 目前,NACSHR已上线企业专属的在线问卷表单,企业只需填写公司规模、当前保险情况和联系方式,即可获得2026年方案免费报价。 Email:nacshr818@gmail.com微信:hinacshr 咨询:https://nacshr.org/Survey/B20843B2-0EC4-77CA-CD23-8B3A9B70C4EC 现在正是审视2026年员工健康保险方案的黄金时间。让NACSHR帮助您的企业做出更专业、更高效、更具竞争力的福利决策。
    快讯
    2025年10月12日
  • 快讯
    USCIS 10月7日晚 E-Verify 系统恢复上线,雇主被敦促尽快清理积压案件 在经历为期一周的停摆后,美国联邦政府的雇佣资格验证系统 E-Verify 于 2025 年 10 月 7 日晚间 正式恢复上线。美国公民及移民服务局(USCIS)确认系统已重新启用,允许雇主再次创建账户、提交验证请求、关闭案件及处理“暂定不确认”(Tentative Nonconfirmation, TNC)等相关事务。 E-Verify 是美国政府用于核实雇员工作合法性的核心工具,通过比对员工在 I-9 表格 中填写的信息与国土安全部(DHS)及社会安全局(SSA)数据库中的记录,判断雇员是否具备合法工作资格。自 10 月 1 日 政府因拨款延迟进入部分停摆以来,该系统被迫关闭,导致众多雇主无法在法定时限内完成验证流程。 此次恢复上线为企业HR和合规部门带来了关键缓冲。USCIS 表示,虽然系统现已恢复运行,但尚未明确“三日规则”(即雇主需在员工入职后三个工作日内提交验证)的重新计算方式。官方也尚未发布有关热线服务及技术支持是否全面恢复的正式指引。 但仍有几个关键问题待澄清: “三日规则”是否立即恢复? 停摆期间提交的延迟案件如何计时? 热线支持和官方指引何时全面上线? 多位法律顾问建议,HR 团队应马上清理所有积压案件,并安排新聘员工及时进入 E-Verify 流程,预防合规风险。同时密切关注 USCIS 的后续通知与政策更新。 多位法律顾问与合规专家提醒,雇主应立即清理停摆期间积压的验证案件,并恢复新员工信息录入,以避免未来可能的合规风险。业内普遍认为,此次在政府部分停摆期间重启 E-Verify,反映出美国政府对就业合规与工作场所执法的高度重视。 E-Verify 的恢复不仅意味着合规系统的重新启动,也提醒企业:面对政策波动与技术依赖,合规响应速度 已成为 HR 团队的核心竞争力。企业应借此机会优化流程、更新政策,确保在未来不确定性中保持运营合规与灵活应对。
    快讯
    2025年10月09日
  • 快讯
    海德思哲(Heidrick & Struggles)13亿美元私有化!猎头巨头迎来新篇章 【海德思哲被收购退市】全球高管猎头巨头Heidrick & Struggles宣布将以约13亿美元被安宏国际(Advent)和Corvex收购并私有化,股东将获每股59美元现金。交易获董事会一致通过,预计2026年一季度完成。CEO汤姆·莫纳罕将继续领导,公司总部仍在芝加哥。德意志银行、瑞银、桑坦德为本次交易提供融资支持。业内认为,此举将助力海德思哲在全球领导力咨询与数字化人才服务领域加速扩张。 2025年10月6日,全球高管猎头与领导力咨询巨头海德思哲(Heidrick & Struggles International,NASDAQ: HSII)宣布,将以约13亿美元的交易总额被私募股权公司安宏国际(Advent International)和Corvex Private Equity牵头的财团收购,并完成私有化退市。这项交易将为股东带来每股59美元的现金回报,较近期股价有明显溢价。 根据公告,海德思哲董事会已一致批准该交易,预计将在2026年第一季度完成,仍需获得股东大会与相关监管部门的批准。交易完成后,公司股票将从纳斯达克退市,但仍将以“Heidrick & Struggles”品牌运营,总部继续设于美国芝加哥。 现任首席执行官汤姆·莫纳罕(Tom Monahan)将在交易完成后继续领导公司,总裁汤姆·默里(Tom Murray)及现有管理团队也将留任,以确保业务与客户服务的连续性。 海德思哲董事会主席亚当·沃比(Adam Warby)表示:“这笔交易是董事会经过全面战略审议后的结果。它不仅为股东提供了即时而确定的现金价值,也为公司吸引、留住和培养卓越人才创造了更灵活的空间。” 收购方安宏国际和Corvex私募基金长期关注专业服务与人力资本领域。据悉,交易的债务融资由德意志银行、瑞银投资银行与桑坦德银行提供。部分海德思哲高管也将以个人投资者身份参与本次交易。 安宏国际董事总经理约翰·迪科拉(John DiCola)在声明中指出:“我们与海德思哲管理团队及Corvex共同看好公司在全球领导力咨询领域的长期潜力。未来将支持其加速拓展产品线、提升数字化服务能力,并进一步扩大国际影响力。” 业内分析认为,此次私有化标志着传统猎头行业正进入新一轮整合周期。在人工智能与数据分析推动的人才服务变革中,拥有品牌积淀与全球资源的海德思哲通过引入长期资本,将有望在技术升级与市场扩张上取得更大灵活性。 作为成立于1953年的高管猎头先驱,海德思哲已在全球超过50个城市设有分支机构,为企业提供高管招聘、领导力评估与组织咨询等服务。此次私有化不仅是资本层面的调整,也被视为其向“数字化人力资本咨询公司”转型的重要一步。 关于海德思哲海德思哲 (Nasdaq: HSII ) 是全球领先的领导力咨询和按需人才解决方案提供商,致力于满足全球顶尖企业的高级人才和咨询需求。作为值得信赖的领导力顾问,我们与客户携手合作,培养面向未来的领导者和组织,并将我们的服务和产品整合到高管搜索、包容性、领导力评估与发展、组织和团队加速发展、文化塑造以及按需独立人才解决方案中。海德思哲早在 70 多年前就开创了高管搜索行业。如今,公司提供综合人才和人力资本解决方案,帮助客户通过打造一个又一个领导团队来改变世界。® www.heidrick.com 关于 Advent InternationalAdvent 是一家全球领先的私募股权投资公司,致力于与管理团队、企业家和创始人携手合作,助力企业转型。我们在五大洲设有 16 个办事处,管理着超过 1000 亿美元的资产*,并在 44 个国家/地区进行了 435 项投资。 自1984年成立以来,我们在五大核心领域积累了专业的市场专长:商业及金融服务、消费品、医疗保健、工业和科技。我们对细分行业的深厚了解进一步巩固了我们的投资策略,从寻找投资机会到与管理层合作执行价值创造计划,这些都贯穿于我们投资策略的方方面面。我们凭借实践操作经验,助力企业发展,加速业务发展。 作为最大的私营合伙企业之一,我们超过 675 名同事利用 Advent 全球资源的完整生态系统,包括我们的投资组合支持小组、行业专家运营合伙人和运营顾问提供的见解,以及定制工具来支持和指导我们的投资组合公司实现其战略目标。 要了解更多信息,请访问我们的网站或在LinkedIn上与我们联系。 *截至 2025 年 6 月 30 日的管理资产 (AUM)。AUM 包括归属于 Advent 咨询客户以及员工和第三方共同投资工具的资产。 关于 Corvex Private EquityCorvex Management LP 由 Keith Meister 于 2010 年创立,致力于投资具有长期良好发展前景的优质企业,并与管理层和董事会合作,以支持长期股东价值。Corvex 秉持业主-经营者理念,与关键利益相关者紧密合作,并凭借其在数十家上市公司董事会任职的丰富经验,积累了深厚的公司治理专业知识,这些董事会成员包括美高梅度假村、Illumina、百胜餐饮集团和摩托罗拉系统等。Corvex Private Equity(“Corvex PE”)由 Joe Costa 于 2024 年联合创立,专注于投资中小型公司。Corvex PE 致力于投资拥有深厚客户关系的持久特许经营权,并与管理团队和目标投资者合作,以推动长期价值。
    快讯
    2025年10月07日
  • 快讯
    美国拟推新签证 H-2C:为关键行业缓解劳动力短缺 概览:美国众议院提出一项跨党派法案,将设立 H-2C 临时工人签证。该签证有效期3年,可续签两次,最长9年。首年签证数为 6.5万个,之后根据市场情况浮动在 4.5万至8.5万 之间。雇主必须证明岗位连续3个月无人填补,且所在地区失业率不高于 7.9%,同时需使用 e-Verify 系统。申请者必须通过背景审查,不得携带家属。支持者称这是应对劳动力短缺的“市场驱动解决方案”,优先保障美国工人权益。 近日,美国国会众议院提出一项名为《促进经济发展的关键工人法案》(Essential Workers for Economic Advancement Act)的跨党派法案,计划设立一种全新的 H-2C 临时工人签证。该签证被认为是介于现有 H-2A(农业工人签证) 与 H-2B(非农临时工签证) 之间的一种新型补充,目标是为美国重点行业解决长期存在的劳动力短缺问题。 主要内容如下: 签证有效期:H-2C 签证初始为 3 年,可续签两次,每次 3 年,最长 9 年,远高于 H-2A/H-2B 的最长期限(一般不超过 3 年)。 年度配额:首年配额为 65,000 个,此后每年将在 45,000 至 85,000 之间浮动,具体取决于经济和市场情况。 雇主要求:雇主必须证明岗位已连续 3 个月无人填补,且当地失业率不高于 7.9%,并强制使用 e-Verify 系统 来验证雇员身份。 申请人条件:申请人需通过 刑事背景审查,不得来自被美国国务院认定为“支持国际恐怖主义”的国家;同时,不允许携带家属。 立法进程:该法案目前编号为 HR 5494,尚需国会通过方能生效。 与 H-2A/H-2B 的主要区别 与传统的 H-2A(农业临时工)和 H-2B(非农业季节工)相比,H-2C 的最大特点在于:停留时间更长、覆盖范围更广、监管更严格。同时,它强调“市场驱动”,通过失业率门槛和岗位空缺证明机制,确保美国本土劳动力优先。 对企业与市场的影响 若 H-2C 签证最终获批,将为美国重点行业提供更灵活的劳动力补充手段,尤其适用于那些非农业但又存在长期缺口的岗位。对雇主而言,这既能缓解用工压力,也意味着合规责任更重。对外籍劳工来说,虽然提供了新的机会,但家庭限制和严格审查将是一大挑战。
    快讯
    2025年09月25日
  • 快讯
    最新:H-1B拟议新规即将公示|按工资水平抽签(09/23/2025) 近期,美国国土安全部(DHS)发布了H-1B签证新规拟议草案,引发全球关注。核心变化在于:从随机抽签 → 工资加权抽签。高薪/高技能申请人中签几率提升。 我们特别刊登Jiaqi Ji 美国锐泽律师事务所律师的解读分析,与你分享,以下是正文 拟议内容 NPRM 状态:国土安全部(DHS)已发布《拟议规则通知》(NPRM) 这不是最终规则;需经过公众意见征集程序后,才能正式生效。 公告网站的链接以及公告原文,可在本文下方查看。 抽签替代机制 当申请数量超过年度 H-1B 名额时,USCIS 采用随机抽签。 名额总共85,000 个,包括 20,000 个预留给拥有美国硕士/博士学位的申请人。 新提案将引入,基于工资水平的加权抽签。职位按照劳工部的《职业就业与工资统计》(OEWS)划分为四个工资等级: 一级(入门,约第 17 个百分位) → 1 次进入抽签池 二级(合格,约第 34 个百分位) → 2 次进入 三级(有经验,约第 50 个百分位) → 3 次进入 四级(完全胜任,约第 67 个百分位以上) → 4 次进入 工资等级越高,进入抽签池的次数越多,显著提高高薪职位的中签几率。 我目前对这套机制的理解: 工资等级(Wage Levels) H-1B 的“工资等级”来源于美国劳工部的 OEWS(职业就业与工资统计) 数据。 每个职业(SOC code)在不同地区都会有一套工资分布,划分为 四个等级(Level I–IV)。 这些等级大致对应统计上的分位数: Level I:约第 17 个百分位 —— 通常对应入门级、刚毕业的新人。 Level II:约第 34 个百分位 —— 对应具有一定经验或专业技能的人才。 Level III:约第 50 个百分位 —— 对应经验丰富、能独立完成工作的员工。 Level IV:约第 67 个百分位以上 —— 对应高度资深、能领导项目或具备特殊技能的人。 NPRM 提案下的抽签机制 USCIS 打算把工资等级作为“中签几率”的加权标准: 一级(Level I) → 进入抽签池 1 次 二级(Level II) → 进入抽签池 2 次 三级(Level III) → 进入抽签池 3 次 四级(Level IV) → 进入抽签池 4 次 举个例子:假设抽签池里有 1000 名申请人: 申请人情况 Level I:500 人,每人 1 个号码 → 500 个号码 Level II:300 人,每人 2 个号码 → 600 个号码 Level III:150 人,每人 3 个号码 → 450 个号码 Level IV:50 人,每人 4 个号码 → 200 个号码 总号码数:500 + 600 + 450 + 200 = 1750 中签几率 Level I:每人 1 个号码 → 1 / 1750 ≈ 0.057% Level II:每人 2 个号码 → 2 / 1750 ≈ 0.114% Level III:每人 3 个号码 → 3 / 1750 ≈ 0.171% Level IV:每人 4 个号码 → 4 / 1750 ≈ 0.229% 对比说明 单个 Level IV 申请人的中签概率大约是 Level I 的 4 倍。 但是因为人数不同,整体比例会是: Level I 占了池子里 500/1750 = 29% 的号码,所以他们整体上中签的人数可能很多。 Level IV 虽然只占 200/1750 = 11% 的号码,但他们人数少,所以每个人的机会高得多。 NPRM 的额外结构要点 受益人中心保障: 自 2024 年起,每位申请人仅计入一次名额,不论有多少雇主为其提交注册。 最低工资等级规则:如果同一申请人被不同雇主按不同工资等级提交注册,USCIS 将采用最低工资等级,以防恶意滥用系统。 多地点工作: 对于跨多个工作地点的岗位,必须采用最低对应工资等级,防止雇主选择低薪地区来“钻空子”。 硕士名额: 2 万个“硕士名额”同样适用工资加权,中签几率也受工资水平影响。 诚信要求: 雇主必须证明注册基于真实的工作机会;若工资虚高或存在策略性虚假提交,可能面临处罚。 其他相关变动与背景 10 万美元费用叠加: 本次拟以新规没有提到 10 万美元“入境费”的事; 2025 年 9 月总统公告规定,所有在 2025 年 9 月 21 日之后提交的新 H-1B 申请必须额外缴纳 10 万美元费用。但具体哪些类型H-1B申请需要缴费,规则暂不明朗,我会持续追踪此事。 总而言之,如果10万美金最终落地实施,雇主将同时面临新费用和加权抽签的双重压力。 历史对比: DHS 强调本次提案与 2021 年被推翻的工资排名规则不同。 2021 规则几乎完全排除了低等级申请,而 2025 年提案采用加权方式, 在倾向高薪岗位的同时,仍保留低工资岗位的申请机会。 政策目的 政策目标: 特朗普政府认为,此举可抑制雇主利用 H-1B 聘用低工资、初级岗位人员,而是鼓励引进“最优秀和最聪明”的人才。 行政令对齐: 此变动落实了“买美国货、雇美国人”总统令的要求,该令要求相关机构优先选择高技能外国劳工。 维持机会: 与 2021 年的工资排名规则不同,本提案并未完全排除低工资等级。雇主仍可为一级或二级工资水平的岗位提交申请,但中签几率较低。 激励机制: USCIS 强调,如果雇主提供的工资高于现行工资要求,中签几率会进一步提升,使工资不仅成为技能水平的体现,也反映雇主对申请人的重视程度。 拟议新规的公告网站引导:https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection/2025-18473/weighted-selection-process-for-registrants-and-petitioners-seeking-to-file-cap-subject-h-1b 作者,Jiaqi Ji, 美国锐泽律师事务所律师 Jiaqi Ji 律师拥有对外经济贸大学,国际经济法学士学位,南加州大学法学院,法学硕士学位,以及乔治华盛顿大学,法学博士学位。曾在Google法务部实习,并在多家顶尖商事移民律所执业,曾服务客户包括Salesforce, PayPal, eBay, Reddit, UPS, Pinterest, deugro, McAfee, Waaree Solar, Mahindra USA等知名企业,涵盖领域包括科技、能源、航运、以及数据安全等。 现任Reid & Wise 美国锐泽律所,杨帆凯 (F. Oliver Yang) 团队律师,专注提供策略性与可执行的解决方案。 杨帆凯(F. Oliver Yang)团队简介 杨帆凯(F. Oliver Yang)律师现在Reid & Wise美国锐泽律所的移民部门,领导一支高效且专业的团队,专注于解决复杂的美国移民法律事务。他为个人、投资者、企业家、高净值人士、跨国公司及行业企业,提供精准法律建议。业务涵盖众多商事移民领域,特别在投资移民领域积累了深厚的经验。他的专业范围广泛,诉讼经验丰富,领导处理了多起联邦诉讼案件。凭借出色的执业表现,其多次获业内权威认可,包括《最佳律师》(Best Lawyers)“值得关注的新星”奖(2021-2024)及《EB-5投资者杂志》“顶尖新星”(2021年与2024年)等荣誉。
    快讯
    2025年09月23日
  • 快讯
    美国国务院推新规:非移民签证必须在其国籍国或居住国的美国大使馆或领事馆预约签证面谈 美国国务院自2025年9月6日起规定,非移民签证申请人必须在其国籍国或居住国面谈,且费用不退不转。 华盛顿讯,2025年9月6日 —— 美国国务院(U.S. Department of State)宣布,自即日起,所有非移民签证(NIV)申请人必须在其国籍所在国或合法居住国的美国大使馆或领事馆进行面谈申请。该新规明确禁止申请人在第三国随意选择签证申请地点的做法,被视为对长期存在的“领事购物”(Consulate shopping )*行为的直接回应。 政策核心内容 根据国务院发布的公告: 面试地点限制:所有申请人必须在国籍国或居住国提交签证申请并参加面试。 第三国申请难度增加:若申请人在非国籍国或非居住国提交签证申请,获批难度将大幅提高。 费用不退不转:在不符合规定地点递交的申请,即使被拒或无法受理,签证申请费(MRV费)也不会退还或转移。 特殊情况安排:如果申请人所在国家因安全或政治原因暂停签证服务,美国国务院将公布指定的第三国使馆作为替代办理点。 背景原因 近年来,部分国家的签证需求激增,中国、印度、墨西哥等地的签证预约等待期甚至超过一年。许多申请人因此选择跨境预约,形成“签证购物”现象,导致部分使馆签证资源被挤占,增加了签证系统的不公平性和混乱度。美国国务院表示,新规的出台旨在优化资源分配、保证审核公正、维护申请秩序。 各界反应与潜在影响 对申请人:跨国预约的便利性被切断,可能导致部分地区等待时间延长,特别是高需求国家。 对留学生与商务人士:必须在本国或居住国排队等待,使跨国灵活性下降,出行和学业计划可能受到影响。 对签证中介行业:依赖跨国预约服务的中介机构将面临业务萎缩,需转型或调整模式。 对美国签证体系:此举有助于减少签证资源被不合理分配的现象,但也会带来申请集中,考验各大使馆和领事馆的处理能力。 专家指出,这一政策体现了美国整体移民与签证管理趋严的趋势。未来,如果高需求国家的等待时间持续延长,如何平衡效率与公平,可能成为政策进一步调整的重点。 Consulate shopping 指的是申请人绕过国籍国或居住国,在第三国申请美国签证,以追求更快、更易或更有利的审批,这种做法被美国视为扰乱秩序的行为。 NACSHR高管签证与移民优选平台可以随时帮助你
    快讯
    2025年09月07日
  • 12345 7 跳转至