2027 洛杉矶北美华人 HR 新年论坛 · 1 月 2 日,第一阶段优惠票 12 月 1 日截止立即报名 →
北美华人人力资源协会
AI 与 HR 科技 · 观点

Yes, HR Organizations Will (Partially) Be Replaced by AI, And That’s Good

2025-05-16 · NACSHR · 阅读约 7 分钟
要点速读 · KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • IBM 宣布其 AI Agent 已能回答 94% 的常见 HR 问题,HRBP 角色除服务高层外基本被取消,CEO 计划削减 HR 人数并将预算转向销售和工程。
  • IBM 前 CHRO Diane Gherson 早年推动 AI 自动化招聘、薪酬分析和绩效管理,2018 年推出的 CogniPay 依据技能给出薪酬建议。
  • IBM 现任 CHRO 表示,AI Agent 可协助撰写绩效评估、制定发展计划,并就绩效相关决策辅导经理和高管。
  • Josh Bersin 预计 L&D 和 HRBP 等领域人均 HR 编制可能减少 20%–30% 或更多,相关人员可转向 AI 平台管理、变革咨询、组织设计、学习架构和数据管理。
  • WPP 借助 OpenAI 与 Reejig 的工具,将职位体系从 6.5 万个职位名称精简到 600 个,作者认为 HR 应聚焦价值创造而非节省编制成本。

AI 根据原文整理,以发布日期为准(2025-05-16)

I adore the human resources profession. These folks are responsible for hiring, development, leadership development, and some of the most important issues in business. And despite the history of HR being considered a compliance function, the role is more important than ever. CHRO salaries, for example, have increased at 5-times the rate of CEO pay over the last twenty years, demonstrating how essential HR has become.

That said, we have to be honest that AI is going to disrupt our role. This week IBM formally announced that 94% of typical HR questions are now answered by its AI agent, and the role of HR Business Partner is all but eliminated except for very senior leaders. As a result the CEO plans to reduce HR headcount and shift that budget towards sales and engineering.

Let’s accept the fact that we are in a time of increasing acceleration. In other words, the capabilities of AI are growing much faster than our organizations” ability to adapt, so we have to lean forward and start redesigning our companies. In the case of HR, our Systemic HR model (which we launched two years ago) is now being fully automated by AI.

I know IBM’s story well, and I think it explains where all HR teams are going. Many years ago Diane Gherson (prior CHRO) started AI projects to automate recruitment, pay analysis, and performance management. She spoke at our conference eight years ago and shared how IBM’s pay tool (CogniPay was launched in 2018) uses AI to make pay recommendations based on skill. This type of tool, which was years ahead of the “skills-based” strategies we see today, essentially automated many of the performance and pay decisions left to managers.

 

Since then IBM has gone much further, and in my last conversation with Nickle Lamoureux (current CHRO) she told me the AI agent helps write performance reviews, creates development plans, and coaches managers and senior leaders on a myriad of performance based decisions. I totally believe this because I see Galileo doing these kinds of things for companies every day. (Check out the Mercury release.)

How does this impact the roles and jobs in HR? Well it definitely eliminates many.

In the case of L&D or HR business partners, I believe we could see a 20-30% or more reduction in HR headcount per employee. And that means these individuals may wind up managing the AI platforms, moving into roles as change consultants (which AI still can’t do), or move into areas like org design, learning architect, and data management.

I think this is all a good thing. While we all worry about AI taking our jobs, we have to remember that our real job is not to “do things” but to “add value” and bring complex problem solving skills to our companies. And in this journey to “crawl up the value curve,” we all have to learn to use AI, develop AI solutions, and think more systemically about how our companies go to market.

I recently interviewed a brilliant HR leader (podcast coming) at WPP who explained how he and his team rationalized their job architecture from 65,000 job titles to only 600 by using new AI tools from OpenAI and Reejig (a work intelligence vendor). As you’ll hear in his story, this effort was a combination of data management, business analysis, change management, and leadership. The results of this work, which are still ongoing, is the opportunity for WPP to dramatically change its go to market strategy, innovation, and growth.

That’s the kind of thing we want our HR teams to do.

And as these various agents hit the market (see my latest view of the market below), HR professionals are going to have to train them, implement them, and “manage them” for long term success. This means analyzing the cross-functional data they produce, extend them into better decision-making, and move our thinking from dated concepts like “time to hire” and “course completion rates” to meaningful measures like “time to revenue” or “time to productivity” or “time to customer service excellence.”

See where I’m going? In a time of increasing technology acceleration we have to “lean in” as hard as we can.

Stop thinking about how much money we save on headcount (which is a fleeting benefit, by the way) and focus on value creation. That’s the big benefit of AI: customer service quality, time to market, and innovation.

In many ways these “HR downsizing” stories are really stores of “HR crawling up the value curve,” which is really a good thing. And for HR professionals, it’s a time for personal reinvention.

每周AI 与 HR 科技要点,周一送到邮箱精选北美用工合规、签证移民、福利保险、招聘与 AI 资讯,外加 NACSHR 活动和会员服务。

每周一封,免费,随时可以退订。提交后请到邮箱点确认。

读完之后,你可能需要

相关文章

全球劳动力报告深度解读:AI时代最大的挑战,不是裁员,而是员工的工作已经改变,组织却还没有跟上2026-10-06IBM最新报告:AI真正重写的不是岗位,而是判断权!给北美华人HR的六个提醒2026-09-22NACSHR观察|加州推进AI“紧急关闭”机制:真正值得企业关注的,不只是一个“开关”2026-09-18

相关最新进展

更多 →
  1. 10-26 06:48【美国】HR 科技公司 TalentNeuron 推出 AI 生成部门结构功能
  2. 10-24 00:38【美国】从汇丰到克罗格,AI 相关裁员持续增加,企业权衡再培训成本
  3. 10-26 03:00【美国】美国运通拟裁员5%,为AI转型和组织精简做准备