观点 - 北美华人人力资源协会

观点

北美HR行业观察：从SAP与Workday的收购和Dayforce 123亿美元私有化到传统招聘网站倒闭裁员，HR科技走向何方 2025 年，HR 科技行业迎来资本主导的新周期。SAP 收购 SmartRecruiters（约 15 亿美元）、Workday 收购 Paradox（15–20 亿美元）、Paychex 41 亿美元并购 Paycor，Dayforce 更是以 123 亿美元完成私有化，创下近年最高纪录。与此同时，CareerBuilder 与 Monster 宣布破产，传统招聘门户彻底退出主舞台，而 Indeed、Glassdoor、Dice 等头部平台也因收入压力掀起裁员潮。HRTechChina 认为，行业正在由“流量驱动”转向“平台化与资本驱动”，未来三到五年，平台主导与商业模式更新将成为核心趋势。资本并购：套件厂商加速补齐短板 2025 年的 HR 科技行业并购步伐异常密集。SAP 宣布收购 SmartRecruiters，其估值约在 15 亿美元左右，这是 SAP SuccessFactors 在招聘领域的重要补位；Workday 宣布收购会话式招聘平台 Paradox（预计交易金额在 15–20 亿美元之间），此前它已收购 HiredScore 与 Flowise，正在逐步形成一个覆盖发现、匹配、对话到招聘入职的完整 AI 招聘体系；Paychex 则以 41 亿美元收购 Paycor，这一交易在中端 HCM 市场堪称标志性事件，显示薪资与人力平台的整合正进入新阶段。通过这些收购，HCM 巨头们正在强化端到端能力，巩固其在不同层级市场的地位。对于 SAP、Workday 来说，并购不仅仅是功能补充，更是平台竞争力与市场版图的战略扩张。私有化浪潮：Dayforce 的大额退市与并购同步，私有化也在重塑行业格局。2025 年 8 月，Dayforce 宣布与 Thoma Bravo 达成协议，将以 123 亿美元的总价退市，股东将获得每股 70 美元的现金溢价。这一交易是近几年 HR 科技领域金额最高的私有化案例之一。私有化意味着 Dayforce 将摆脱季度财报压力，获得更大的战略灵活度。未来，它可以更加专注于全球薪资、劳动力管理和 AI 驱动的长期布局。这一案例也说明，私募基金正在通过资本运作重新定义 HR 科技公司的发展路径，把更多资源押注在长期增长与平台化能力上。传统招聘网站的衰落与破产如果说 HCM 平台的收购与私有化代表着行业集中度的提升，那么传统招聘网站则在经历另一种命运。2025 年，CareerBuilder 与 Monster 在长期亏损和竞争力下降后，进入破产与资产出售程序。Monster 的部分资产由 PartnerOne、Valnet 等公司收购，品牌与部分业务仍在维持，但其黄金时代已经结束。这些平台在过去十余年曾是招聘行业的入口，但在 LinkedIn、Indeed 以及新兴 AI 招聘技术的冲击下，传统流量型门户逐渐失去了话语权。破产不仅意味着模式的失败，也代表了行业从“广告驱动”向“智能匹配和平台化”彻底转变。招聘巨头的裁员潮即便是仍在市场前列的招聘平台，也未能幸免于行业调整。2025 年，Indeed、Glassdoor、Dice 等知名招聘平台相继传出裁员消息。它们的业务模式依然依赖于招聘广告和流量转化，但在经济环境趋紧与 AI 自动化招聘崛起的背景下，收入增速放缓、盈利承压。裁员潮反映出两个趋势：一是传统的广告与订阅模式正在逐渐被边缘化；二是招聘市场对效率与体验的要求不断提升，而依赖“海量简历投递”的旧模式已经难以满足雇主与候选人的需求。行业趋势与未来展望从资本市场的角度看，2025 年 HR 科技行业的走势非常清晰。一方面，SAP、Workday、Paychex 等巨头通过收购强化平台化能力，推动行业集中度进一步提升；另一方面，私募基金通过大额私有化交易让公司摆脱资本市场的短期约束，转向长期战略发展。与此形成对比的是，传统招聘门户的衰落和招聘广告模式的坍塌，表明行业正在进入一个全新的阶段。招聘的核心不再是“流量和曝光”，而是“匹配和体验”。未来，能够通过平台化和智能化手段帮助企业高效找到合适人才的厂商，将在竞争中脱颖而出。 NACSHR 认为，这一轮变革本质上是资本逻辑与商业模式的双重演进：资本通过并购和私有化推动行业集中，技术则通过平台化和智能化颠覆旧有模式。未来三到五年，HR 科技行业将走向“平台主导、资本驱动、模式更新”的全新时代。来源：公司公告、新闻稿、行业分析报道（SAP、Workday、Paychex、Dayforce、CareerBuilder、Monster、Indeed、Glassdoor、Dice 等公开信息）

观点
2025年08月23日
观点

深度观察 | AI重构HR的未来蓝图：战略编排才是核心战场--解读Deloitte《HR Reimagined: Agentic AI for HR》在AI加速重塑企业运作方式的今天，人力资源领域也正经历着一场深刻变革。2025年夏季，Deloitte 发布了最新研究报告《HR Reimagined: Agentic AI for HR》，由资深人力资本与AI转型顾问 Greg Vert 和 Kyle Forrest 联合撰写。报告围绕“Agentic AI”（智能体AI）这一新一代技术，系统探讨了AI如何在HR全价值链中发挥作用——从战略规划、治理体系，到能力建设与技术架构，并通过16项HR核心能力与67个具体活动的分析，描绘了从AI辅助（Assisted）到增强（Augmented）再到AI驱动（AI-Powered）的成熟路径。本文将结合报告核心内容与行业背景，带来一份深入的中文解读，帮助HR领导者与业务决策者理解AI在HR中的落地价值、潜在风险及战略编排方法。非常值得推荐阅读！！如果需要PDF 可以邮件我们 nacshr818@gmail.com 获取德勤报告人工智能的快速发展，正在让HR领域面临一次前所未有的变革。从招聘到员工体验，从绩效管理到流程优化，AI的触角已经伸入几乎所有HR职能。Deloitte 在《HR Reimagined: Agentic AI for HR》中，描绘了一幅未来蓝图——AI不再只是工具，而是HR战略执行的核心力量。本文将结合报告要点，带来一份面向HR领导者的深度解读。 1. AI在HR的三种形态：从辅助到驱动报告指出，AI在HR的应用大致分为三个阶段：辅助型（Assisted）：AI为人类提供支持，如自动生成职位描述、初步整理数据等。增强型（Augmented）：人类与AI交替协作，AI能处理部分复杂任务，如候选人筛选、知识库更新、调查分析。驱动型（AI-Powered）：AI主导流程执行，人类负责监督与优化，例如自动完成员工咨询、生成分析报告、触发跨部门流程。解读：企业应先明确自身在这三个阶段中的位置，然后规划向更高阶段的演进路径，而不是盲目堆砌工具。 2. Agentic AI：HR的“虚拟同事” 传统AI往往是功能插件，作用单一。而Agentic AI的特征在于：理解上下文、规划多步骤任务、调用不同系统完成工作，并能根据反馈优化执行。这类AI更像是一名“虚拟同事”，能够独立完成从信号识别到结果交付的全流程。解读：这要求HR团队具备“管理AI”的能力——为AI设定任务边界、明确流程接口、评估其工作成效，而不是只当它是一个按钮或查询工具。 3. 角色重塑：从事务处理到战略赋能 AI的引入会让HR的时间分配发生显著变化： HR业务伙伴（HRBP）：从有限服务部分业务单元，转向为全体管理者提供战略性人才辅导。卓越中心（COE）：从数据收集整理转向实时洞察与预测，参与前置决策。 HR运营（HR Ops）：80%以上的日常事务由AI执行，团队重心转向员工体验和流程改进。解读：HR的绩效评估指标也应随之调整，从“完成多少任务”转向“业务贡献度”和“战略影响力”。 4. 高价值落地场景报告给出了一些能快速显现成效的Agentic AI应用：入职流程：多个AI协作完成任务分配、福利登记、培训安排，跨平台无缝衔接。请假与返岗管理：AI提前识别返岗事件，触发跨部门流程，并根据反馈优化体验。人才保留：AI实时分析流失风险并推送定制化留才方案，直接触发奖励或调配。解读：这些场景有三个共性——跨系统、闭环执行、可持续优化，非常适合做为企业的AI试点项目。 5. 碎片化风险与战略编排如果不同部门各自引入AI工具，很容易造成“67个AI源”的割裂局面：数据孤岛、体验不一致、治理困难。报告提出五个关键步骤来避免碎片化：规划：目标与业务战略、员工需求一致；治理：覆盖伦理、数据安全、信任机制；能力建设：集中AI专业能力，设立卓越中心；编排：工具互通并嵌入核心流程，而非外挂；衡量：效率、体验、公平性与成果并重。解读：这本质上是“企业级AI治理”的HR版本，需要跨部门协作才能真正落地。 6. 技术趋势：多智能体系统（MAS）未来12-18个月，用户与HR系统的交互将从传统API调用，逐步转向多智能体系统（MAS）——多个AI可以相互协作、与人类互动、跨平台执行复杂任务。例如，招聘AI可以直接与培训AI、薪酬AI协作，实现从录用到入职培训到福利登记的自动化闭环。解读：这意味着企业未来的AI生态将是“团队作战”而非“单兵作战”，需要提前规划架构与数据接口。结语：AI价值取决于编排能力 AI进入HR是不可逆趋势，但它的价值并不会自动释放。真正的竞争力来自于战略性编排与持续优化——让AI不只是辅助工具，而是组织能力的一部分。对于想在未来人才竞争中保持领先的HR团队来说，现在正是重新设计角色、流程与能力结构的关键窗口期。报告来源：Deloitte《HR Reimagined: Agentic AI for HR》作者：Greg Vert 与 Kyle Forrest

观点
2025年08月13日
观点

在线招聘市场“死亡”了，美国求职者何去何从？在过去40多年里，求职方式经历了从纸质简历与面对面投递到完全线上化的巨大转变。然而，最新数据和市场趋势显示，这一被认为高效便捷的“在线求职”体系，正在失去效果，甚至成为求职者与用人单位之间的“高墙”。从SAP到AI：招聘流程的全面自动化早在1981年，德国SAP公司在信息技术展上展示了其R2软件，让企业首次能够用电脑管理简历、人事与招聘申请。这一创新开启了在线招聘的序幕。进入90年代，Monster、CareerBuilder等在线招聘网站取代了线下投递，使求职可以跨地域进行，但也让单个岗位收到的申请量激增。为应对庞大简历量，Taleo、iCIMS、Jobvite等申请人追踪系统（ATS）迅速普及，实现了简历解析、候选人排名等功能。到2010年代，ATS全面上云，并与LinkedIn、Indeed等平台整合。到2020年，越来越多企业将ATS与CRM、AI结合，自动完成候选人筛选、沟通及面试安排——许多情况下，人力资源部门直到面试当天才首次看到候选人简历。数字背后的真相：0.19%的成功率尽管看似高效，这一体系对求职者极不友好。视频引用的2025年3月数据显示：美国有 720万个职位空缺，其中 540万成功招到人；仅有约1/3 的岗位通过Indeed、LinkedIn等公共在线招聘平台完成招聘；平均只有 3% 的申请者能获得面试机会，而面试者中约 48% 最终获聘；美国每月约有 2000万求职者，平均每人投递50份简历，总申请量高达 10亿份；计算可得，通过公共招聘网站投递一份简历获得录用的概率仅 0.19%（约514份简历才能换来一次录用）。这一低成功率还被大量“无效申请”进一步稀释，包括无资质的盲目投递，以及利用浏览器插件自动批量投递的“简历机器人”，造成ATS与自动化拒信的“机器人对机器人”循环。三条可能出路全面拥抱AI与ATS优化通过关键词堆砌、简历格式匹配等手段适应AI筛选。但现实中，大量求职者缺乏技术与自我营销能力；同时，ATS易放大偏见，如亚马逊旧系统曾因简历含“女性”而自动降分，Workday也正面临歧视诉讼。技术监管通过立法限制招聘算法的偏见与不透明性。然而，美国缺乏有效的科技监管传统，短期内难以落地。 “人性化”招聘回归越来越多企业回到以人为核心的招聘模式——职业招聘会、校园招聘、行业展会、招聘专员直聘、试用期招聘、实习转正等。这些渠道构成所谓的“隐性就业市场”，成功率远高于在线投递。求职者的现实策略主动联系招聘专员：通过LinkedIn搜索“Recruiter”或“Talent Acquisition”，直联表达兴趣，并在申请后跟进，避免简历被ATS直接淘汰。利用招聘会与校园渠道：91%的美国公司通过职业招聘会招录全职应届岗位，尤其是对需要学历或技能证书的行业。州级就业服务：尤其适合非学生与偏远地区居民，提供职位信息、简历辅导、职业培训、心理支持等，且由纳税人资金支持。参与实习项目：多数实习已转为有薪，即便不满足全部要求也应申请，因为企业往往聘用条件与招聘描述不完全一致。在AI与ATS主导的招聘时代，单纯依赖在线求职平台已难以打开职场大门。2025年的美国求职者若想突破0.19%的“冰点成功率”，必须转向更具人际互动和目标针对性的渠道——主动出击、建立关系网络，才有机会在这个充满自动化与竞争的市场中脱颖而出。

观点
2025年08月12日
观点

员工体验平台的演进：推动 AI 转型的关键引擎 Josh Bersin 公司发布新研究指出：员工体验平台（EXP）正在成为企业 AI 转型的关键基础设施。EXP 不再只是HR工具，而是推动组织学习、透明沟通和员工赋能的核心平台。研究提出五大战略：以人为本、自下而上、持续学习、透明沟通和实时优化。案例包括 Microsoft 的 HR AI 转型、ASOS 的 AI 自动化、Clifford Chance 的法律文书 AI 起草。EXP 赋能组织实现敏捷变革和AI落地。 AI 正在快速改变职场——不仅是技术，更是组织文化与工作方式的深刻变革。人工智能（AI）的广泛应用为生产力、效率和业务增长带来了前所未有的机遇。然而，AI 转型并不仅仅意味着“部署新技术”，它实际上深刻地重塑了员工体验，影响着组织文化、团队协作方式与工作流程。在这一转型过程中，员工体验平台（Employee Experience Platform，简称 EXP）正逐渐从传统的 HR 工具，演进为推动企业成功实施 AI 的关键引擎。EXP 不再只是一个用于请假或查政策的门户，而是集成沟通、学习、协作、数据与自动化的智能化平台，帮助组织推动 AI 采纳、提升员工准备度，并确保 AI 真正带来业务价值。员工体验平台的演进 EXP 的初始功能主要是处理事务性流程，如请假申请、薪资查询等。但如今，随着 AI 技术的发展，EXP 已演变为智能化的交互中心，集成以下核心功能：跨系统的员工沟通与协作提供关于 AI 使用和员工情绪的实时洞察支持个性化的学习与技能建设自动化重复任务，让员工专注于更有价值的工作同时，得益于 AI Agent 的融入，如今的 EXP 变得更易使用，员工可通过自然语言与系统交互，实现跨系统流程操作，无需再进入多个事务性系统。因此，EXP 不再是“可有可无”的系统，而是企业 AI 成功转型的关键基础设施。企业 AI 转型案例我们调研了三家具有代表性的公司，探讨他们在 AI 转型中如何借助 EXP 实现落地与成效： 1. ASOS（线上时尚零售）部署 Microsoft Copilot 与 Microsoft Viva 赋能多业务部门用 AI 驱动 HR 案例处理工具，提升服务效率通过自助服务门户精简事务流程用自定义 AI bot 自动完成可持续认证流程成果：员工生产力提升、参与度增强、AI 无缝落地 2. Microsoft（打造 AI 驱动的 HR 部门）通过 Viva 学习模块开展 AI 培训自助 HR 工具增强员工支持体验实时分析 AI 使用情况，持续优化策略成果：HR 效率显著提升，数千名 HR 领导参与 AI 社群 3. Clifford Chance（国际律所）用 AI 起草法律文件，为律师提供初稿借助 AI 语言工具跨越法律语境差异利用 AI 管理法律知识，快速找出相关案例成果：文书效率提升、知识共享加速、决策更精准 AI 转型的敏捷性要求与传统变革不同，AI 推广不是一次性事件，而是一个持续试验、迭代和适应的过程。因此，企业需具备“变革敏捷性”（Change Agility），用灵活的机制推动员工学习和组织协同。借助 EXP 实现 AI 成功的五大战略我们总结出五个成功企业在 AI 转型过程中普遍遵循的策略，而 EXP 是支撑这些策略实施的核心平台： 1. 以人为本与目标导向（Focus on People and Purpose） AI 的导入需与组织使命、价值观和员工需求保持一致。EXP 可确保所有 AI 工具围绕员工体验设计，提升参与度、工作效率和福祉。 ? 案例：Microsoft HR 借助 Viva Amplify 定制 AI 推广内容，让 HR 团队及时获取战略沟通信息，确保 AI 项目与业务目标保持一致。 2. 采用自下而上的迭代方法（Bottom-Up, Iterative Approach） AI 转型不能靠高层指令推动，而应依赖一线员工的反馈与试验。EXP 通过实时反馈与学习机制，让员工在实际工作中试用、迭代与优化 AI 工具。 ? 案例：ASOS 借助 Viva 社区功能发起“Work Smarter”活动，员工可在平台上公开交流 AI 使用案例，形成知识共享文化。 3. 鼓励透明沟通与试验精神（Transparent Communication and Experimentation）员工需要明确知道 AI 工具的使用场景、目的与风险，才能建立信任并积极参与。EXP 提供结构化、公开的试验机制，确保过程透明。 ? 案例：Clifford Chance 在 Microsoft Viva 中嵌入 AI 工作流程，员工可以实时测试 AI 辅助起草功能，同时了解其运行逻辑。 4. 推动持续学习与技能建设（Continuous Learning and Skill-Building）员工必须掌握 AI 基本素养，才能有效融入 AI 工具。EXP 提供基于角色定制的学习路径，支持技能升级与长期成长。 ? 案例：Clifford Chance 借助 Viva Learning 培训员工 prompt 工程、AI 素养与数据分析技能，为 AI 工具的使用打下基础。 5. 实现实时度量与持续优化（Real-Time Measurement and Improvement）与传统 IT 项目不同，AI 推广必须持续监测并快速调整策略。EXP 提供实时分析能力，帮助企业追踪员工情绪、生产力与 AI 使用情况。 ? 案例：Microsoft HR 借助 Viva Insights 实时追踪 AI 使用频率、员工负荷减轻情况与情绪变化，以便动态调整 AI 战略。 HR 在 AI 转型中的新角色在 AI 重构工作的过程中，HR 部门不再只是支持者，而是：主导员工技能升级与再培训协助重塑岗位定义与工作流程在 HR、IT 与业务之间架起 AI 战略桥梁落实负责任 AI 政策，确保 AI 应用符合伦理与企业文化 HR 将在未来的 AI 时代中扮演 “战略引导者 + 管理变革催化者” 的核心角色。行动建议与未来展望企业若想在 AI 转型中取得成功，应当： ✅ 采用“变革敏捷”思维，持续学习、实时迭代 ✅ 建立 AI 驱动的员工体验平台，支持流程与文化融合 ✅ 打破 HR、IT、业务之间的壁垒，实现跨部门协同 ✅ 实施实时度量机制，根据反馈不断优化 AI 战略 EXP 已成为企业迈入 AI 未来的基础设施。 AI 将持续重塑职场，但决定 AI 成败的关键并非技术本身，而是组织是否能让员工真正拥抱 AI、用好 AI。 EXP 不再只是一个 HR 工具，而是打造学习型组织、推动信任建设和灵活变革的“中枢神经系统”。企业若想在 AI 驱动的时代中保持竞争力，就必须把员工体验放在战略核心位置。作者：Kathi Enderes | 全球研究与行业分析高级副总裁 | Josh Bersin Company

观点
2025年07月19日
观点

How California Employees Can Navigate Conflict & Respond to Workplace Aggression 在加州职场，冲突虽常见，但若升级为言语、心理或身体上的攻击，员工权益和安全便受到严重威胁。本文由加州资深劳动律师 Andrea Amaya 撰写，结合丰富实务经验，为员工提供一套应对职场侵害的法律行动指南。首先，员工需识别何为“正常摩擦”与“侵害行为”之间的界限——如果对方的行为使你感到受威胁、被羞辱、被排挤，或影响工作绩效，就不应被视为“职场常态”。其次，律师强调“记录一切”的重要性，即便是微小的不适也应及时整理证据，如保存邮件、截图聊天记录，并建立日志。面对挑衅时，理性、专业的回应比情绪化反应更具保护力。文章建议使用明确措辞维护自身底线，并在适当时向HR正式提出书面投诉。但员工也需意识到HR并非完全中立，举报时需谨慎、留存所有记录。如担心遭遇打击报复，建议先与律师沟通。当局势持续恶化、损害身心健康时，员工应评估是否需要寻求法律援助或考虑离职。在加州，基于歧视、骚扰或报复的侵权可向 CRD 或 EEOC 提出申诉。作者最后提醒，职场毒性文化的存在并非员工本人的失败，勇敢维权、优先保护自己的心理健康，是专业、成熟且有力的选择。 LOS ANGELES, July 15, 2025-Conflict is part of any workplace and often unavoidable. It can look like subtle disrespect in meetings or outright hostility behind closed doors.But when conflict escalates into aggression, whether it be verbal, psychological, or even physical, and it starts threatening your dignity, safety, and career, it stops being a mere HR matter. As an employment lawyer in California representing employees across industries, I've seen how workplace aggression, left unchecked, can erode mental health, derail careers, and silence otherwise brilliant voices. But I've also seen how clarity, strategy, and the courage to act can turn conflict into a turning point rather than a breaking point. Here's how California employees can navigate workplace conflict and respond to aggression in a way that's not only safe and smart, but legally informed. 1. Recognize the Difference Between Discomfort and Abuse Not every disagreement is "hostile work environment" material. Workplaces are made up of employees with differing opinions, personalities and backgrounds. Disagreements are bound to happen. However, there is a difference between a disagreement or a misunderstanding and a toxic work environment. Many workers, especially in hierarchical or high-pressure fields, normalize toxic dynamics. If you find yourself second-guessing whether your colleague's tone, your supervisor's "jokes," or the constant exclusion from meetings are just part of the job, pause. Ask yourself: Is this behavior isolating me, threatening me, humiliating me, or interfering with my ability to do my job? In California, workplace aggression can cross legal lines if it includes harassment (especially if based on protected characteristics like race, gender, age, disability, etc.) or retaliation (for reporting wrongdoing, requesting medical leave, etc.). It doesn't have to be physical. Verbal attacks, threats, and sabotage count. 2. Document Everything, Even the "Small" Stuff Legal cases aren't built on vibes; they're built on records. If a coworker publicly berates you, if your boss sends passive-aggressive emails, or if you're left out of key communications, write it down. Save the emails. Screenshot the thread. Keep a running log with dates, what happened, and who was present. Even if you never file a formal complaint, documentation arms you with clarity and credibility. It helps HR understand patterns, not just isolated events. And if things do escalate legally, it could be the difference between "he said, she said" and a compelling, evidence-based claim. 3. Respond Strategically, Not Emotionally It's human to want to snap back at the colleague who cuts you down in front of others. But emotional reactions can be used against you later, especially if the aggressor is angling to provoke you. Instead, respond with professionalism. If safe, call out the behavior calmly: "I'd prefer to be spoken to respectfully. Is there something specific you want to address?" If you're in a meeting, redirect the conversation or note the inappropriate behavior in writing afterward. Use phrases like: "To clarify what was said earlier…" "For the record, I'd like to note…" Standing up for yourself may feel uncomfortable, especially if you're junior or underrepresented, but it is a crucial step to protecting your dignity. Remember: assertiveness is not aggression. It's boundary-setting. 4. Use Your Company's Processes, But With Eyes Wide Open HR is supposed to be a neutral party, but in practice, they often serve the company's interests. That doesn't mean you shouldn't report bad behavior. It means you should report with awareness. When making a complaint: Be clear, specific, and factual. Stick to workplace impact (e.g., "This interfered with my ability to do X"). Ask for a written acknowledgment of your complaint. Save a copy of everything you submit or receive. In California, retaliation for complaining about unlawful behavior (discrimination, harassment, wage violations, etc.) is itself illegal. Nonetheless, retaliation by an employer is still common. If you're concerned about blowback, consult an employment lawyer before filing the complaint. 5. Know When to Escalate, And When to Exit There comes a point when the question shifts from "Can I fix this?" to "Is this worth staying in?" That's not quitting. That's choosing yourself. If conflict or aggression becomes chronic, or harmful to your health, or it remains unresolved, it may be time to seek outside help. In some cases, a legal letter can prompt change. In others, a claim with the California Civil Rights Department (CRD) or Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may be appropriate. And sometimes, the bravest and healthiest move is to walk away, with your records intact, your self-respect preserved, and legal options open. This doesn't mean you are giving up. You are simply prioritizing your mental and physical health. You are not unprofessional for protecting your peace. And you are not alone. Take action. Final Thoughts If you're dealing with constant tension or subtle hostility, it's easy to internalize it as a personal failure. But much of what we call "personality conflicts" in the workplace is actually a failure of culture and leadership. Especially for employees from marginalized communities, navigating workplace aggression can feel like an invisible second job. Recognize when a situation is harmful. Leaving a workplace that no longer suits you is not a sign of weakness. While workplace aggression can make you feel powerless, remember that you have the power to control the outcome. You don't need to be loud to stand up for yourself. You just need to be strategic, supported, and unshakably clear on your worth. The law, when understood and applied, is a powerful ally. Contact D.Law by calling (818) 875-2008 or send a message with any questions or concerns you may have regarding your employment rights. Our attorneys are experts in California employment law and worker's rights and can help you with the problems you are faced with. -By Andrea Amaya, Associate Attorney, D.Law

观点
2025年07月15日

观点

前谷歌HR副总裁谈：AI不是“理解”人类，而是“预测人类”，Laszlo Bock谈职场的下一个十年挑战在2025年5月的一场广受关注的主题演讲中，前Google人力资源主管、Humu创始人Laszlo Bock分享了他对“AI如何重塑未来工作形态”的深度洞察。这不仅是一场关于技术的讲座，更是一份面向HR群体的战略警告和实践指南。他的核心论点可以归结为三点：AI并不真正“理解”语言，它只是预测下一句话最可能出现什么词；AI将迅速改变职场结构，尤其是初级岗位和事务性工作的消失；HR若不掌握数据能力和实验逻辑，将失去为员工发声和引导组织转型的机会。人类直觉无法判断AI边界：它看世界是“token”，不是意义 Laszlo用一个看似简单但极具颠覆性的观点开场：AI不是在“思考”，而是在“预测”。他指出，大型语言模型（LLMs）是通过将语言拆解成“token”（语言单位）进行训练的。这些模型并不具备语义理解能力，而是基于庞大的语料库，预测下一个最有可能的token。比如，当你问AI“生成一个1到100之间的随机数”，你可能经常得到“42”这个答案。这并不是因为42有任何数学意义，而是因为它在互联网上出现频率高——尤其是在大量关于《银河系漫游指南》的内容中。这种基于“频率预测”而非“逻辑理解”的模式导致AI具备一种“锯齿状的能力边界”——即它在某些任务上表现卓越，但在看似相似的任务上却经常出错。例如，它可以写出流畅的商业邮件，但无法准确区分事实与虚构；它可以写诗，但很难遵守准确的格式要求；它可以下棋，却经常做出输局的决策。正因为如此，我们人类在评估AI能否胜任某项任务时，往往会被自己的“直觉”误导。 AI提升了工作绩效平均值，但并不意味着每个人都会受益 Laszlo引用了BCG与哈佛商学院的联合研究，展示AI对员工绩效的实质影响。在这项研究中，团队设计了18种与真实工作情境接近的任务，从数据分析到创意思维，从说服性表达到战略建议。结果发现，当员工使用AI工具协助完成任务时，整体绩效水平显著提升，原本员工间28%的能力差距被缩小至5%。这意味着，未来的职场中，“差距”会被压缩，“平均”成为常态。听起来似乎是件好事，但Laszlo却抛出一个值得HR深思的问题：如果每个人都变得“高效”，组织会如何反应？是减少工时？提高薪酬？还是干脆将“平均线”当作新标准，进一步压缩人力成本？这并非杞人忧天。历史经验告诉我们，技术进步往往首先带来“效率红利”，但最终这些红利会在某些层级被资本所吸收，而不是自动回流到员工手中。职场结构正在重构：五类岗位首当其冲在对未来工作的预判中，Laszlo明确指出了五类岗位或将迅速减少，甚至消失。首先是离岸外包型工作。随着AI在数据处理、文档生成等任务中的普及，企业将更倾向于直接部署AI模型，而非将工作转包给人力成本较低的国家。其次是初级岗位，尤其是在咨询、银行、律师事务所等以“精英路径”著称的行业。大量初级岗位的主要任务是处理数据、制作PPT、整理分析报告，这些恰恰是AI擅长的内容。第三类是事务性小时工，例如快餐店点单员、呼叫中心客服等。这些岗位过去被认为是“不可被机器取代”的人机交互工作，如今正被AI语音助手、聊天机器人、自动点餐系统等迅速替代。第四，组织将逐渐发现一个更棘手的问题：中层管理人才短缺。Laszlo预测，未来4至7年内，具备协调能力、能带团队、能处理人际复杂问题的管理者将变得极为稀缺，因为AI可以替代事务执行，但无法承担信任建立、冲突调和、判断取舍等高度人性化的职责。最后，是那些“以为安全”的专业性岗位，例如金融分析师、法律助理、初级产品经理等。如果其主要职责是信息归纳与逻辑输出，同样处于AI威胁之下。 HR需重新定位：别再做“感觉派”，而要成为“实验派” Laszlo在演讲中特别点名了HR行业的一个致命短板：很多政策和项目的设计并没有建立在实证基础之上，而是靠“经验”与“感觉”。他列举了一些广泛存在的误区，例如：提高员工内推奖金，并没有显著提升推荐量；健康激励项目（如健身补贴）往往吸引的本来就是健康人；看重名校背景的招聘标准，与员工实际绩效无关，甚至有时是负相关；培训项目6个月后的绩效反而下降；要求员工返岗的政策，降低了满意度，但并未提升生产力。这些都说明，缺乏实验和数据支持的HR决策，可能带来反效果。因此，他呼吁HR团队要向科学靠拢，掌握A/B测试、因果验证、数据解读等基本实验方法。特别是在部署AI相关工具和流程时，必须通过“高质量实验”来判断其真正影响，否则就只是被技术牵着走。企业该如何准备？Laszlo提出六条实践路径为了帮助企业和HR真正应对AI带来的变革，Laszlo提出了六条务实的建议。这些建议并不需要企业“砸钱买AI”，而是聚焦于“组织能力”的构建。第一，清洗和集中数据。数据质量是AI成功的前提，脏乱差的数据只会导致错误的预测和决策。第二，建立统计和实验能力。无论是HR项目还是AI工具的效果评估，都必须靠科学实验说话。第三，设立“AI专责角色”。组织中应有一位专门负责AI探索的人，持续关注行业动态，并定期向管理层报告AI试点进展。第四，选择业务最痛的地方，或个人最热情的领域作为AI试点起点。这样更容易获得支持与反馈。第五，培养员工的学习能力，并将其作为招聘标准。因为我们无法预测未来五年最需要的技能，但可以培养出善于学习的员工。第六，保持耐心。AI转型不是一蹴而就的。强生公司就用了三年时间，通过系统实验才明确AI的价值落点。 HR的第二次“高光时刻”已到来 Laszlo的结尾令人动容。他说，疫情期间，HR成为企业最重要的部门之一——引导组织远程办公、调整政策、守护员工心理健康。今天，随着AI浪潮席卷而来，HR再次站在战略变革的第一线。而这一次，HR面临的不是临时危机，而是长期结构性重塑。一个真正成熟的HR团队，必须不仅能理解人，也要能理解技术；不仅能提出人本关怀，也能设计科学流程；不仅能代表员工发声，也能为组织盈利模式注入长期主义。这既是一份挑战，更是一份召唤。 AI时代来临，每一个组织都必须重新思考“人”的价值。而HR，正是那个最应该引领答案的人。 Laszlo Bock的这场演讲，值得每一位HR反复阅读、深入讨论，并在组织内部真正落地。如果你还没有准备好，不如从这六件事做起。如果你已经在路上，欢迎把这篇文章分享给更多同行，一起构建一个更智慧也更有人性的未来职场。备注： Laszlo Bock背景介绍：前 Google 全球人力资源高级副总裁（SVP of People Operations），Humu 联合创始人，已退出管理岗位，AI 与组织变革思想领袖。畅销书：《Work Rules!》（2015）

观点
2025年07月13日
观点

【深度报道】硅谷惊现“顶级面霸”，简历造假连骗十余家AI公司，北美HR该警惕什么？近日，一起涉及十多家硅谷 AI 初创公司的“简历造假+多头就业”事件震惊了整个科技圈。主角是一位名叫 Soham Parekh 的印度工程师，他凭借在技术面试中的优异表现，先后在多家初创公司就职，甚至部分同时任职，并声称每周工作140小时。事件的导火索源于图像生成公司 Playground AI 的 CEO Suhail Doshi 在 X（原 Twitter）上的实名举报，随后多家初创公司相继站出证实与 Parekh 的雇佣与解雇经历，包括 Antimetal、Lindy、Create、ComfyUI、Fleet AI 等，几乎清一色为 YC（Y Combinator）孵化背景的企业。多头就业？还是系统性漏洞？虽然美国加州法律并未禁止雇员兼职，但 Parekh 的行为之所以引发轩然大波，是因为他存在以下问题：使用伪造学历（如声称拥有 Georgia Tech 硕士学位） GitHub 项目疑似“包装过度” Zoom 面试时谎称人在美国，实际IP显示身处印度屡次被解雇但能轻松再获 Offer，形成雇佣循环工作交付远低于承诺，甚至多公司反馈其“几乎无产出” 这一系列行为揭示了当前北美科技公司在远程招聘背景下的五大漏洞： 1. 简历与学历审查不严许多初创公司在招人时过于依赖面试表现和 GitHub 活跃度，对候选人学历、工作经历缺乏核查机制。 2. 技术面试高分≠实际产出 Parekh 多次在面试中表现优异，尤其在 React 与 DevOps 领域，但一旦入职就无法履行职责，说明当前技术面试对“长期交付能力”的考察存在缺失。 3. 远程办公带来信任危机通过 Zoom 面试与异地远程入职，极易被滥用。“IP 追踪”被多家公司采用验证位置，显示出公司对员工身份与地点的焦虑日增。 4. 过度信任 YC 背景的候选人许多招聘方坦言，Parekh 能屡次拿到 Offer，与其参与 YC 系初创项目、GitHub 活跃度高有关，但这种“光环式信任”在缺乏交叉验证时，极易成为盲点。 5. 缺乏有效的背调与信息共享机制多家公司解雇了 Parekh，却未能及时通过社群或平台共享信息，直到一位 CEO 发帖才引发连锁反应。这也暴露出科技圈在“异常雇员识别”机制上的空白。对北美HR的警示本事件不仅是一桩个案，更是一场对北美 HR 制度与工具的“压力测试”。在“远程优先”“AI技术密集”背景下，人力资源工作者需要：建立更专业的背景核查流程，包括教育机构验证、IP地点确认等；结合技术评估与行为面试，增强对“真实可持续能力”的识别；强化员工入职后的绩效追踪与多头就业监控机制；推动行业层面建立异常简历举报与信息共享系统。 Soham Parekh 的行为是否构成道德或法律上的越界，还需进一步讨论。但毋庸置疑的是，这场“顶级面霸”事件已为 HR 敲响警钟：招聘不再只是看简历与技术，更需系统性的信任验证与制度设计。在新一轮 AI 用工浪潮下，HR 不仅要“招得快”，更要“识得准”。

观点
2025年07月04日
观点

The Workday Economy – A Bold New Strategy Emerges By Kathi Enderes, SVP Research and Global Industry Analyst with comments by Josh Bersin The Workday Innovation Summit 2025 was more than an analyst meeting: it was a signal that Workday is attempting a full-scale reinvention. Under CEO Carl Eschenbach and Board Chair Aneel Bhusri, Workday is shifting from a product-centric model to an open, partner-driven, AI-powered ecosystem they call “The Workday Economy.” Let’s explain what the company is up to. Strong Financial Performance Now on its 20th birthday, Workday is in a position of strength: – $7.7 billion in subscription revenue – 16.9% year-over-year growth – 11,000+ customers in 175+ countries – 70 million users – 93% customer satisfaction. The company’s goal is to reach $10 billion over the next few years, which means continuing this level of growth. Workday is banking on a few big bets: aggressive partnerships and industry solutions, building Agentic AI, investment in Workday Financials, and a mid-market offering. Let’s look at each of the components in detail. The Platform Play: From System to Ecosystem Workday’s legacy as a highly integrated, proprietary stack (or “walled garden”) worked for years, but now it slows innovation. Now, with intention to make Workday an open platform, the company is expanding its Built on Workday program and expanded Workday Marketplace, to build a “Workday Economy.” Partners and customers can use Workday Extend to build applications natively, with low-code tools and lots of support. Comment by Josh: Workday Extend is a massive priority, but building Workday apps is difficult. With 87 partners now, how big can this app ecosystem become? And just as Apple tightly controls apps for the i-Phone, can Workday do the same with such complex industry partners? They’re definitely going in the right direction. Partnerships as Engine of Innovation Workday’s partner ecosystem is now front and center, supporting ISVs, advisory firms, system integrators, and co-innovation partners. A new Clear Skies Initiative is supposed to prevent channel conflict, ensuring partners can build without competing with Workday’s core offerings. Strategic alliances with Randstad, TechWolf, and five new Workday Wellness partners (including MetLife) are examples. Can Workday use these partnerships to drive real, measurable results? Many partner programs are simply referral relationships: how will sales and service teams invest in the success of these partnerships? This is a new muscle for Workday to build. Comment by Josh: This is big. I think Carl understands that Workday’s “market power,” built through its reputation over 20 years, lets the company pick winning partners and resell their offerings, invest in them, and stop trying to build or compete with everyone in this market. This is the type of behavior a $20-30 Billion company demonstrates, and I hope it continues. (ADP white labels many products and their business never stops growing.) Agentic AI: The Next Frontier Agentic AI is clearly core to the strategy. The Workday Assistant, powered by Illuminate, lets employees interact with HR and finance in natural language, across Microsoft Teams, Slack, and more. Early agentic applications like the Payroll Agent, Employee Self-Service Agent, or Recruiting Agent are promising, but the real test will be customer adoption to create business value. As companies deploy more specialized agents, Workday’s Agent System of Record aims to manage all agents, not just the ones created on Workday. With big players like Microsoft, Google, and ServiceNow aiming for the same level of control, this will be a tough battle to fight. Comment by Josh: I’m not really convinced that Workday can be a system of record for agents, when the system is missing so much data. I would bet on Microsoft, Google, Okta, or others to dominate the agent governance market. On the other hand, agents that work with Workday (recruiting agents, L&D agents, pay agents, etc.) do have to integrate with Workday somehow, so to me this is a way to integrate, not “govern” agents. Agent Extensibility and Customization The new Workday Assistant Studio lets partners and customers build agents to fit unique workflows. This extensibility is good news for customers, but it comes with risk. How well will these interfaces work and how easy will it be for vendors to build integrated apps? Workday now has direct integration with Microsoft Copilot and Google, but most Agent-builders are going after customers directly, and they may or may not want to be held hostage within the Workday Assistant. Comment from Josh: Right now SAP Joule is a year ahead of Workday in ERP/HCM Assistants. Most Workday clients I talk with are afraid to even let employees touch the system and they’re deploying Copilot, ChatGPT, Galileo, or other dedicated assistants. The Workday Assistant strategy needs a bold new move, and Studio alone may not be enough. I think Workday may be better off focusing on optimizing its utility within other more broad AI assistants. (What happened to Workday’s big alliance with Salesforce I wonder.) HCM Innovation: Industry Focus and Acquisition Integration Workday’s HCM suite remains the company’s core, with a focus on practical AI and the employee experience. Industry-specific solutions for higher education, healthcare, and financial services are expanding, offering another path to growth and becoming indispensable for clients. Recent acquisitions like HiredScore, VNDLY, and Evisort can add mature AI-driven capabilities that can bring the HCM product (built 20 years ago) into the latest AI era, given the competition in this space. (Workday now resells Evisort.) Comment from Josh: Workday HCM product teams understand what customers need. The challenge they face is “getting there from here,” so I would bet we see many more acquisitions. If you read our latest research on the Revolution in Corporate Learning, for example, you see that Workday has missed this market. Ditto many recruitment features (high-volume, online job previews, AI-assessment.) So I would expect Workday to do more deals like HiredScore, where they get an AI product base and some amazing HCM product talent. Strong Focus on the Financial Suite Workday’s financial management suite is now central to its growth story, with over 35% of new customers choosing it. The company is pushing industry-specific financial applications, automation, and real-time insights. But the finance function can often be conservative and risk-averse, and the promise of truly integrated HCM and Finance solutions is still a dream for most customers. International Expansion Workday’s global ambitions are bold. New offices, expanded partnerships, and talent programs in EMEA are all part of the plan. Today only 25% of revenue comes from international markets so the company will need to invest heavily here. SAP and Oracle are quite dominant in some countries, so the company has to pick its markets carefully. And remember local players. As Workday courts the Global 2000 (including First-Citizens Bank & Trust, UnityPoint Health, and Toyota), the company definitely needs to build out support, partnerships, and presence in these geographies. Comment from Josh: There are many geographies (Asia, UK, Eastern Europe) where Workday is not well entrenched. While SAP and Oracle dominate some of these markets, if Workday builds a strong partnership model (ie. exclusive SI partnerships in these geos, etc.) they can double their growth rate in these sectors. Look at how well Workday has done in Australia (a fairly small market). Is the Mid-Market Ready for Workday? Expanding to the mid-market is another tenant of Workday’s growth plan. With WorkdayGo, the company is adapting its enterprise playbook to leverage partners. With players like UKG, Rippling, ADP, Dayforce, and HiBob providing tailored, right-sized solutions designed for this segment, Workday will find lots of resistance in this market. (SAP tried this years ago.) Comment from Josh: This is a push for me, I’m skeptical. I love Workday as a product but it’s very complex and needs major administrative support. I doubt Workday can effectively compete with HiBob, UKG, and the others Kathi mentions without building or buying a new product. Years ago Taleo (pioneer in ATS) acquired a separate company to launch Taleo Business Edition and that product sold like hotcakes. I have a hard time seeing how pre-configured Workday SKUs make it that much easier to administer. But who knows, maybe an AI-powered “configurator” could fix that up. Customer-Centric Innovation The 2025 Spring Release delivered over 350 new features, shaped by customer feedback. AI-powered talent rediscovery, simplified workflows, and industry-specific enhancements are all on the list. Customers are reportedly happy and shaping the roadmap. This pace of innovation requires companies to keep up with Workday, often not an easy feat, especially in the AI areas, where adoption still lags the many capabilities Workday offers. A focus on supporting AI transformation will be key to drive real value. Josh’s Perspectives Workday is an ambitious, well run, culture-driven company. These announcements signal a major shift from “technology-based” to “market-based” growth. There’s no question in my mind that thousands of ISVs and integrators would love to build businesses around Workday. The only question is how quickly Workday can make this easy and profitable (for them). As far as AI goes, the market is very competitive. SAP’s AI strategy quite far along (Joule is more extensible than the Workday Assistant), and many AI startups are reinventing the HCM market from scratch. So while the Workday Agent System of Record makes sense, many new “Agent-core” or “AI-native” HCM apps will chip away at Workday’s footprint. That all said, this is an exceptionally well run, strong, “Irresistible Organization”. With a new CTO and strong focus on global growth, I see no reason Workday can’t achieve its $10 Billion target in the next 3-4 years.

观点
2025年06月12日
观点

Yes, HR Organizations Will (Partially) Be Replaced by AI, And That’s Good I adore the human resources profession. These folks are responsible for hiring, development, leadership development, and some of the most important issues in business. And despite the history of HR being considered a compliance function, the role is more important than ever. CHRO salaries, for example, have increased at 5-times the rate of CEO pay over the last twenty years, demonstrating how essential HR has become. That said, we have to be honest that AI is going to disrupt our role. This week IBM formally announced that 94% of typical HR questions are now answered by its AI agent, and the role of HR Business Partner is all but eliminated except for very senior leaders. As a result the CEO plans to reduce HR headcount and shift that budget towards sales and engineering. Let’s accept the fact that we are in a time of increasing acceleration. In other words, the capabilities of AI are growing much faster than our organizations” ability to adapt, so we have to lean forward and start redesigning our companies. In the case of HR, our Systemic HR model (which we launched two years ago) is now being fully automated by AI. I know IBM’s story well, and I think it explains where all HR teams are going. Many years ago Diane Gherson (prior CHRO) started AI projects to automate recruitment, pay analysis, and performance management. She spoke at our conference eight years ago and shared how IBM’s pay tool (CogniPay was launched in 2018) uses AI to make pay recommendations based on skill. This type of tool, which was years ahead of the “skills-based” strategies we see today, essentially automated many of the performance and pay decisions left to managers. Since then IBM has gone much further, and in my last conversation with Nickle Lamoureux (current CHRO) she told me the AI agent helps write performance reviews, creates development plans, and coaches managers and senior leaders on a myriad of performance based decisions. I totally believe this because I see Galileo doing these kinds of things for companies every day. (Check out the Mercury release.) How does this impact the roles and jobs in HR? Well it definitely eliminates many. In the case of L&D or HR business partners, I believe we could see a 20-30% or more reduction in HR headcount per employee. And that means these individuals may wind up managing the AI platforms, moving into roles as change consultants (which AI still can’t do), or move into areas like org design, learning architect, and data management. I think this is all a good thing. While we all worry about AI taking our jobs, we have to remember that our real job is not to “do things” but to “add value” and bring complex problem solving skills to our companies. And in this journey to “crawl up the value curve,” we all have to learn to use AI, develop AI solutions, and think more systemically about how our companies go to market. I recently interviewed a brilliant HR leader (podcast coming) at WPP who explained how he and his team rationalized their job architecture from 65,000 job titles to only 600 by using new AI tools from OpenAI and Reejig (a work intelligence vendor). As you’ll hear in his story, this effort was a combination of data management, business analysis, change management, and leadership. The results of this work, which are still ongoing, is the opportunity for WPP to dramatically change its go to market strategy, innovation, and growth. That’s the kind of thing we want our HR teams to do. And as these various agents hit the market (see my latest view of the market below), HR professionals are going to have to train them, implement them, and “manage them” for long term success. This means analyzing the cross-functional data they produce, extend them into better decision-making, and move our thinking from dated concepts like “time to hire” and “course completion rates” to meaningful measures like “time to revenue” or “time to productivity” or “time to customer service excellence.” See where I’m going? In a time of increasing technology acceleration we have to “lean in” as hard as we can. Stop thinking about how much money we save on headcount (which is a fleeting benefit, by the way) and focus on value creation. That’s the big benefit of AI: customer service quality, time to market, and innovation. In many ways these “HR downsizing” stories are really stores of “HR crawling up the value curve,” which is really a good thing. And for HR professionals, it’s a time for personal reinvention.

观点
2025年05月16日
观点

你以为大家都懂 AI？其实他们都在装懂——Pluralsight《2025 AI 技能报告》深度解读 “我其实不太懂，但又不好意思说。”——这是许多技术人员和高管面对 AI 时的真实心声。在我们谈论 AI 如何颠覆行业、重塑岗位的时候，也许我们忽略了一个关键问题：究竟有多少人真的懂 AI？ Pluralsight 最新发布的《2025 AI 技能报告》给出了一个惊人的答案：大多数人其实都在“演戏”。是的，你没有听错。报告调查了来自美国和英国的 1,200 位技术高管和从业者，发现整整 79% 的人承认夸大了自己对 AI 的理解，而站在组织最前线的高管，居然有 91%“装懂”。这不仅是一场职场里的集体错觉，也是一面照见现实的镜子：AI 正在迅速成为新的职场“裸泳”试炼。 “会不会用 AI”变成了一种表演在很多公司，使用 ChatGPT 或 Copilot 本应是一种提升效率的手段，但却被悄悄贴上了“偷懒”的标签。报告显示，61% 的人觉得在工作中用生成式 AI 会被认为不够敬业。于是，人们开始偷偷摸摸地用 AI —— 不打招呼、不留痕迹，生怕别人知道自己依赖了工具。这种“影子 AI”现象，让整个职场变得有点像小学考试时偷偷翻书的学生：大家都在作弊，却都装作没有。 “我懂 AI”成为职场社交货币在调查中，九成从业者自信地说：我有足够的技能把 AI 工具融入工作中。但问题来了：几乎同样比例的人又说，是“其他人”的 AI 技能不够，才导致项目失败。这不是一个技术问题，而是一个认知偏差问题。正如报告所言，这可能是“达克效应”（Dunning-Kruger Effect）在作怪：越不懂的人越自信，越懂的人越谨慎。我们真的会被 AI 取代吗？报告也揭示了另一种深层焦虑：90% 的受访者担心自己被 AI 替代，而这个比例较去年增长了 19%。最焦虑的行业包括：内容创作、数据分析、销售和市场。但现实其实并不那么残酷。数据显示，有近一半的企业正在新增 AI 相关职位。换句话说，AI 并不是“替代者”，而是“重塑者”。只是那些被“重塑”之前的人，必须先完成一场认知与技能的跃迁。真正的赢家，懂得不断更新幸运的是，大多数公司正在醒来。59% 的企业已经开始提供 AI 培训，54% 的企业通过涨薪来缓解员工的焦虑，甚至有些公司开始为员工提供“AI 心理建设”。更可喜的是，有 8 成的技术从业者表示：AI 真的让我的工作更轻松了。从数据建模到个性化推荐，从云管理到自动化任务，这些看似“高冷”的 AI 应用，正在变得触手可及。写在最后：别再装了，真的可以学也许我们都该承认：AI 发展太快了，不懂是常态，懂才是稀缺。真正拉开差距的，从来不是“演得像不像”，而是你有没有诚实地面对自己的技能盲区，并持续进步。这份报告不是在揭示一个笑话，而是在给每一个职场人提个醒：别再装了，时间不等人，AI 的浪潮已经拍到了你脚边。你是要假装会游泳，还是现在就跳下去学？

观点
2025年04月03日

《 1 234 5 》 16 跳转至

订阅NACSHR周报

HR Jobs