是时候重塑人才招聘了 -Research Shows It’s Time To Reinvent Talent AcquisitionJosh Bersin 的文章 "研究表明，是时候重塑人才招聘了 "强调了人才招聘亟需进行的变革。由于只有 32% 的人力资源高管参与战略规划，而且许多人觉得自己只是个接单员，因此这篇文章呼吁进行战略改革。在劳动力短缺和急需技能型招聘的情况下，目前削减成本和减少招聘力度的方法与对技能型专业人才日益增长的需求相矛盾。文章敦促企业将人才招聘作为一项重要的战略职能，利用现代技术并将其与学习和发展相结合，以提高效率并关注内部人才流动。
原文如下：
This week we published a disappointing research study, Talent Acquisition at a Crossroads. The study, conducted in partnership with AMS, points out that talent acquisition leaders (this is a senior position) are largely left out of their company’s strategic planning process and many feel they operate as “order takers.”
In today’s world of labor and skills shortages, this is a wakeup call for change.
Here’s the data:
Among these 130+ HR executives only 32% are involved in any form of strategic workforce planning, 42% believe their company has no workforce plan at all, and 46% say “they’re running around to keep up.” And when layoffs do occur, often the recruiters go first. (Witness Tesla this week.)
All this is happening in a world where 58% of companies feel skills shortages are significantly impacting their business plans, more than three-quarters believe they must transform their talent practices to grow, and “skills-based hiring” is a top priority yet difficult to implement.
Here’s the paradox: companies are cutting their talent acquisition spending at the same time CEOs feel that skills shortages are getting worse. What’s going on?
Talent Acquisition Needs A Reinvention
Let’s just face it: recruiting as a business function has to change. Once considered the “staffing department,” where companies posted jobs and scanned resumes, talent acquisition has become highly strategic operation. What skills do we need? How do we find people who will fit our culture? What internal candidates should fill our key positions? Who are the right leaders for us to hire?
Unfortunately, almost 80% of talent acquisition functions are quite tactical. PwC’s CEO survey found that CEOs rate “hiring” as the third most bureaucratic process in their companies, tied with “too many emails” and “too many meetings” as a time-wasting process. And that explains why two-thirds of TA leaders are being asked to cut costs.
I had a conversation last week with a former TA leader for one of the Big Three automakers. He told me that in the fervor to hire staff for EV engineering he was asked to hire “any engineer he could find, regardless of skill,” because the company was in such a hurry. No time for skills assessment, competitive planning, or even location analysis. Just “go out there and hire engineers.”
We have been studying the auto industry as part of our GWI study and found that important EV roles (reliability engineer or power plant engineer, for example), are quite specialized and hard to find. Strategic recruiting departments need to understand these roles and source these individuals carefully. Just hiring engineering grads from a local community college is not going to move this needle.
(Consider the data by Draup on what these roles are. Talent Acquisition teams with talent intelligence skills can pinpoint who to hire.)
And it gets worse. In our Dynamic Organization research we found that high performing companies focus heavily on internal hiring, talent intelligence tools to find hidden talent, and continuous internal development to fill skills gaps. We can’t simply throw job requisitions over to the recruiting function any more: the people we need may be buried inside the company.
This week Tesla announced a layoff of 10% of their workforce. Was their time to balance and redeploy talent internally? Absolutely not. According to my sources every business unit had to let 10% go, and and many of the people being fired were talent acquisition leaders, the very people who help with these issues.
We talk with many HR executives and there is an enlightened group. Companies that understand this issue (about one in eight) have elevated Talent Acquisition to a strategic function, they merge or integrate TA with L&D, and they redefine their recruiters as “talent advisors.” Mastercard, as a leader, just renamed their recruiters as “Career Coaches,” demonstrating their role in helping people find the right jobs.
Despite the onslaught of AI, this role is becoming even more human-centric. High-powered recruiting teams source internal candidates, understand company culture, and have a deep knowledge of jobs, roles, and organizational dynamics. When well supported and trained, these professionals are strategic advisors, not just “recruiters.” And companies that understand this often outsource or automate much of the administration in recruiting.
Technology plays a major role in this reinvention. Most large companies have dozens of legacy systems, many of which make the candidate experience difficult. When organizations focus on modernizing and streamlining their technology, talent acquisition can become 10-100X more efficient. This, in turn, gives recruiters and talent advisors the time to search for the right skills, carefully select the best candidates, and focus on internal hiring and development as a strategy.
Technology Is Here But Not The Entire Answer
Of all the HR technology markets, recruiting is the most innovative of all. New AI-powered systems like HiredScore (just acquired by Workday), Paradox (leader in conversational AI), Eightfold, Gloat, Draup, and Lightcast (pioneers in talent intelligence), and many others can reduce time to hire from months to weeks and weeks to days. But none of this technology works if the Talent Acquisition team is left on an island.
In the last year I have met with more than 50 heads of talent acquisition and once the door is closed and we talk honestly, they always tell me the same thing. “We are not treated as a strategic function, we are being asked to cut costs, and we are constantly running from fire to fire to keep executives happy.” This type of “service-delivery” focus simply will not work in the new economy.
What should companies do? As part of our Systemic HR initiative, we help companies evolve their TA Function to operate in a more strategic way. Organizations like Bayer, Verizon, and many others have elevated the role of recruiter to talent advisor, they’re building skills in talent intelligence, and they’re integrating the recruiting function with L&D, career management, and employee engagement.
I’ve always felt that recruiting is the most important things HR professionals do. If we can’t get the “right” people into the company, no amount of management can recover. But what does “right” mean? And how can we source, locate, and attract these particular people?
This is a highly strategic operation, and one that must integrate with internal mobility, culture, and employee experience. I encourage you to read our Systemic HR research, join our Academy, or reach out to us or AMS for advice. In this new era of talent and skills shortages, we simply cannot run recruiting in this tactical way any longer.
layoffs
2024年04月24日
layoffs
知名员工奖励公司BlueBoard突然宣布关闭BlueBoard, a once-popular software company for organizing employee rewards, abruptly ceased operations, leaving users in the dark regarding their accounts and rewards. Founded in San Francisco in 2014, the company experienced financial struggles despite raising seed and Series A funding. The abrupt shutdown raised concerns among users about unreturned funds and unresolved rewards. The company failed to issue any advance notices of layoffs, contrary to regulations. The situation has prompted discussions on the proper ways to shut down a company.
据KQED报道，知名员工奖励软件公司BlueBoard本周突然宣布停止运营。
公司在周五发送给用户的邮件中声明：“我们即将停止所有运营，并将关闭公司网站和应用程序。从此以后，我们将不再提供任何服务。”
BlueBoard成立于2014年，总部最初设在旧金山，专注于为企业提供员工奖励和表彰的软件解决方案。如今，该公司已经停业，官网上的通知仅简单表示：“自2024年3月12日起，BlueBoard停止所有运营。感谢过去几年里所有支持我们的人。”
公司表示：“我们已经尝试了数月来获得续续经营所需的资金，遗憾的是我们未能成功。” BlueBoard在2015年完成种子轮融资，并在2020年完成A轮融资，据Crunchbase数据显示。但是，由于财务困难，公司不得不在2017年将总部迁至圣地亚哥，并最终走向关闭。
对于用户是否能够使用系统中存储的奖励，目前尚无明确信息。
首席执行官兼联合创始人Taylor Smith在接受KQED采访时表示，“目前有几方正在努力找到解决方案。”但他没有提供更多评论。
在在线论坛中，BlueBoard的用户对公司的突然关闭表示惊讶，并询问他们是否还能访问自己的账户。
“这是一个展示如何不应该关闭公司的‘绝佳’案例研究。”一位用户在Y Combinator运行的Hacker News论坛上表示，“他们没有提到如何退还客户资金，这是所有客户最关心的问题。第二个问题是关于正在进行或已经预定的奖励的状态，这也没有在邮件中提到。”
在X上（该网站之前被称为Twitter），一位用户抱怨：“真的吗，@blueboard就这样关闭了，并且没退还他们欠我妻子的500美元？”
截至上周五，BlueBoard尚未向州就业发展部门发出任何关于大规模裁员的工人调整和再培训通知。按照规定，公司在关闭工厂或进行大规模裁员前，需要提前60天通知员工和政府。
请继续关注此事件的最新发展。
layoffs
layoffs
layoffs
layoffs
layoffs
layoffs
扫一扫
添加客服
