• agile HR
    颠覆认知:全球劳动力报告揭示的5个反直觉趋势 当今的商业领袖和人力资源专家正面临一个前所未有的挑战:如何在全球范围内高效、合规地管理日益分散的团队?随着全球化团队的兴起,管理的复杂性呈指数级增长,旧有的模式正在失效。我们似乎都认为,更大的人力资源团队、更多的工具和更严格的控制是唯一的出路。 然而,Remote发布的《2025年全球劳动力报告》揭示了一些关于人力资源、技术和全球招聘的惊人真相,其中许多发现甚至与我们的直觉背道而驰。这份报告基于对10个国家的3,650名人力资源和商业领袖的调研,为我们描绘了一幅截然不同的未来工作图景。 本文将为您提炼出其中最关键的五个发现。准备好,这些洞察可能会彻底改变你对未来工作的看法,并为你的组织战略提供新的方向。 1. “精简人力资源”并非资源不足,而是一种新式超能力 传统观念认为,管理庞大的全球员工队伍需要一个同样庞大的人力资源部门。但数据显示,事实恰恰相反。小型人力资源团队(即使只有1-3人)在员工体验和留任率等关键指标上的表现,与大型团队相当,甚至更好。这并非偶然。 报告中的一个关键数据显示,**87%**的受访公司的人力资源或招聘团队规模不超过九人。这些精简的团队之所以能爆发出惊人的能量,其背后的秘密在于技术。他们正通过采用集成式全球人力资源平台、人工智能和自动化等创新工具,巧妙地实现了“以少胜多”。这些技术使他们能够轻松处理跨国薪酬、合规和员工体验等复杂事务,从而在全球舞台上产生巨大的影响力。 “随着公司在全球范围内的扩张,员工的敬业度和留任率不能靠运气。数据显示,业务表现与我们在增长过程中为员工提供支持的程度直接相关。那些无论在哪个地区都优先考虑文化和发展一致性的人力资源领导者,将能保持发展势能并留住顶尖人才。” Barbara Matthews Chief People Officer at Remote 2. 全球人才库已非备选项,而是默认配置 在过去,国际招聘通常被视为一种补充策略。然而,如今的格局已发生根本性转变:全球招聘已迅速成为企业获取人才的默认选项。 这一转变的规模是惊人的。报告预测,到2026年,**73%**的领导者预计其超过一半的新员工将来自公司的主要国家之外。这一趋势背后的主要驱动力是本地人才的稀缺——74%65%29%。然而,即使是较为谨慎的市场也显示出加速的迹象,法国计划中的国际招聘比例将在未来数月从29%上升至38%。 3. 人人都对全球合规充满信心——然而几乎人人都曾失败 在处理复杂的国际劳动法规时,信心是必不可少的,但过度的自信却可能是危险的。报告揭示了一个惊人的“信心差距”:一方面,高达**98%**的领导者对自己了解运营国家的法规充满信心。 但另一方面,现实却给了他们沉重一击:74%42,000美元,而其中31%50,000美元。这种信心与现实的巨大鸿沟,代表着全球扩张中最大的未管理财务风险之一,它将合规从一个法律复选框转变为财务规划的关键组成部分。 4. 人力资源领域的AI革命已至,但现实既混乱又棘手 人工智能无疑是人力资源领域最具变革潜力的技术。数据显示,**75%**的人力资源领导者预计,到2026年底,人工智能将处理超过一半的日常行政任务。这预示着一个更高效、更具战略性的未来。 然而,通往未来的道路并非一帆风顺。当前的现实是一场快速而混乱的实验:在过去一年里,28%停止使用某个人工智能招聘工具,但几乎同等数量(27%)的团队则开始使用一款新的人工智能工具。与此同时,**21%**的团队发现了由人工智能生成且包含误导性或虚假信息的简历。这一系列数据表明,真正的机会不在于零散地采纳各种AI工具,而在于建立一个整合的、治理良好的智能平台。 5. 你的人力资源团队讨厌他们的软件(并且正积极寻求替代品) 认为人力资源团队正在与他们的技术栈作斗争,这并非凭空猜测,而是一个可量化的行业现实。报告明确指出,“工具泛滥”问题已让人力资源团队不堪重负。这种现象普遍存在,超过80%的人力资源团队需要同时操作2到5个独立的系统来管理核心职能。平均而言,每支团队需要使用3.6个工具,而**32%**的领导者认为“过多孤立的工具”是他们技术栈面临的首要挑战。 这种挫败感已经达到了临界点。一个最具说服力的数据是:**近九成(nearly 9/10)**的人力资源领导者表示,如果能获得一个集成了全球薪酬和合规功能的一体化平台,他们愿意立即替换掉现有的核心人力资源信息系统(HRIS)。这种对整合平台的压倒性需求,不仅仅是为了追求用户便利,它更是实现“精简人力资源”模式的根本推动力,使得小型团队能够在不按比例增加人手的情况下实现全球化运营。 结论:面向未来的思考 《2025年全球劳动力报告》清晰地描绘了一种新的运营现实:精简且依赖技术的人力资源团队,肩负着驾驭全球人才的重任,而这项使命正不断受到复杂法规、混乱的人工智能应用以及碎片化软件格局的考验。人力资源部门正从传统的行政角色,演变为技术驱动的战略推动者,但这一转变过程伴随着巨大的压力和前所未有的复杂性。 随着这些趋势的不断加速,真正的问题不再是你的组织是否会适应,而是能否足够快地适应。你的团队为这个新现实做好准备了吗?
    agile HR
    2025年11月06日
  • agile HR
    The 10 golden rules for establishing a people analytics practice 十大黄金法则: 战略适配性:确保人力资源分析项目与组织的战略目标对齐,以实现最大的价值和影响。 持续的员工倾听:通过整合员工和业务的声音,优先处理正确的战略人力资源问题。 证据基础的HR服务整合:将所有基于证据的HR服务整合到一个功能中,提升人力资源分析的交付速度和质量。 清晰的人力资源分析操作模型:建立一个目标操作模型,明确客户、可交付服务、服务水平和交付时间。 数据隐私合规性:遵守数据隐私法规,同时考虑数据分析在文化和业务连续性方面的影响。 数据驱动决策的HR能力提升:通过提升HR社区的数据和洞察力使用,将业务机会转化为分析服务。 管理HR数据:建立集中的企业级数据基础设施,改善数据的组合、共享和分析能力。 产品设计和思维:确保人力资源分析服务的用户设计友好,易于导航,并激励用户在决策中使用数据。 实验与最小可行产品:通过实验和最小可行产品,逐步评估和改进解决方案,避免大规模实施失败。 利用人工智能的潜力:构建和实施基于机器学习的AI功能,确保模型的性能和有效性,同时控制数据偏见和合法性。 这些法则展示了通过系统方法创建并采纳人力资源分析实践的重要性,强调了以数据和证据为基础支持人力资源功能的必要性。 It is time for an update on my previous posts on the 10 golden rules of people analytics, simply because so much has happened since then. For example, continuous employee listening, artificial intelligence (AI in HR), agile HR, employee experience, strategic workforce management, and hybrid working are just a few emerging topics in recent years listed in Gartner's hype cycle for HR transformation (2023). In the last year, I have spoken to many people working in different organisations on establishing people analytics as an accepted practice. I have also joined some great conferences (HRcoreLAB, PAW London & Amsterdam) where I learned from excellent speakers. I also (re)engaged with some excellent people analytics and workforce management vendors, such as Crunchr, Visier, eQ8, AIHR, One Model, Mindthriven, and Agentnoon. Finally, I also enjoyed having multiple elevating discussions with some thought leaders who influenced my thinking (e.g., David Green, Rob Briner, Jonathan Ferrar, Dave Millner, Sjoerd van den Heuvel, Ian O'Keefe, Brydie Lear, Jaap Veldkamp, RJ Milnor, and Nick Kennedy). These encounters and my ongoing PhD research on adopting people analytics resulted in a treasure trove of new ideas and knowledge that confirmed my experience and beliefs that it is all about creating an embraced people analytics practice using a systemic approach in supporting HR in becoming more evidence-based. So, like I said, it's time for an update. I hope you enjoy and appreciate the post, and I invite you to engage and react in the comments or send me a direct message. Create a strong strategy FIT. It is obvious but not a common practice that your people analytics portfolio needs to align or fit with your strategic organisational goals. A strong strategic FIT ensures you execute people analytics projects with the most value and impact on your organisation. It is, therefore, important to integrate the decision-making on where to play in people analytics with your periodic HR prioritisation process. Strategic workforce management and continuous employee listening are pivotal in prioritising the right strategic workforce issues The bigger picture is that two people analytics-related HR interventions, strategic workforce management and continuous employee listening, are pivotal in prioritising the right strategic workforce issues. By blending the insights from these HR interventions, you ensure you are prioritising based on the voice of the business and the voice of the employee. See also my previous post on strategic workforce management. Because people analytics is at the core of these HR interventions and provides many additional strategic insights, I argue we need a new HR operating model where the people analytics practice is positioned at the centre of HR. I argue that we need a new HR operating model where the people analytics practice is positioned at the centre of HR Grow and integrate evidence-based HR services. Based on my experience and research, I strongly advise integrating all evidence-based HR services into one function. See also my previous post on establishing a people analytics practice. This integration will enhance the speed and quality of your people analytics delivery, make you a trusted analytical strategic advisor, and make you a more attractive employer for top people analytics talent. All other people analytics function setups seem like compromises. With evidence-based HR services, I refer to activities such as reporting, advanced analytics, survey management, continuous employee listening, organisational design and strategic workforce management. It is hardly ever that a strategic question is answered by only one of these services. In most cases, you will need to combine survey management (i.e., collecting new data), perform advanced analytics (i.e., build a predictive model), and share the outcomes in a dashboard (i.e., reporting) or build new system functionality based on the models (e.g., vacancy recommendation). You will need to combine various people analytics services to provide real strategic value Create a clear people analytics operating model. Because the people analytics practice is maturing, it deserves a clear target operating model. In a target operating model, you clarify to the organisation whom you consider your clients, what services or solutions you can deliver, what service levels your clients can expect, and when and how you will deliver the solution. Being transparent about your target operating model will build trust and legitimacy in your organisation. Inspired by the work of Insight222, a people analytics target operating model consists of a demand engine (understanding and prioritising demand), a solution engine (e.g., data management, building models, designing surveys), and a delivery engine (e.g., dashboards, advisory with story-telling, bringing models to production), ideally covering all the evidence-based HR services mentioned under rule 2 in this post. Additionally, more practices are applying agile principles to increase time-to-delivery and are using some form of release management to balance capacity. Built trust and legitimacy Compliance with data privacy regulations has been an important topic since the early days of people analytics ten years ago. Even before the GDPR era, organisations did well to understand when personal data could be collected, used, or shared. Legislation such as GDPR offers guidance and more structure to organisations on how to deal with data privacy issues. Being fully compliant is not where responsible data handling ends However, being fully compliant is not where responsible data handling ends. Simply because you can, according to data privacy regulations, doesn't mean you should. There are also contextual and ethical elements to take into account. For example, being able and regulatory-wise allowed to build an internal sourcing model matching internal employees with specific skills with internal vacancies doesn't mean you should. From a cultural or business continuity perspective, creating internal mobility may not be beneficial or desired in specific areas of your organisation. Assessing the implications of using data analytics in a broader context than just regulations will also enhance the needed trust and legitimacy. Upskill HR in data-driven decision-making Having a mature people analytics practice that delivers high-quality, evidence-based HR services is not enough to ensure value creation for your organisation. Suppose your organisation, including your HR community, struggles to translate business opportunities into analytical services or finds it hard to use data and insights on a daily basis in their decision-making. In that case, upskilling is a necessary intervention. HR upskilling in data-driven decision-making is a necessity in growing towards a truly evidence-based HR culture Creating awareness of the various analytical opportunities, developing critical thinking, creating an inquisitive mindset, identifying success metrics for HR interventions and policies, evaluating these metrics, and understanding the power of innovative data services, such as generative AI, is essential. When upskilling, be sure to recognise the different HR roles and their needs and preferences. For example, your HR business partners will likely want to develop their skills in identifying strategic workforce metrics and strategic workforce management. However, your COE lead (i.e., HR domain leads) wants to develop their ability to collect and understand internal clients' feedback and improve their HR services (e.g., recruitment, learning programs, leadership development). So, diversify your learning approach to make it more effective. Manage your HR data There is enormous value in integrating your HR and business data in a structured matter. Integrated enterprise-wide data allows you to combine, improve, share, and analyse data more efficiently. More organisations are using data warehouse and data lake principles to create this central enterprise-wide data infrastructure based on, for example, Microsoft Azure or Amazon Web Services technology. A mature people analytics team is best equipped to create an HR data strategy and manage the corresponding data pipeline. HR would do well to improve its capability to manage the data pipeline by hiring data engineers. It is an interesting discussion about where to position this data management capability and related skill set. The first thought is to position this capability close to the HR systems and infrastructure function. This setup might work perfectly. However, based on your HR context and maturity, I argue that the people analytics practice is a good and sometimes better alternative. Mature people analytics teams are likely more able to think about data management and creating data products and services built with machine learning models. Traditional HR systems and infrastructure teams may tend to focus too much on the efficiency of the HR infrastructure (e.g., straight-through processing, rationalising the HR tech landscape). Excel in product design and thinking Successful people analytics or evidence-based HR services excel in product design. Whether built with PowerBI or vendor-led BI platforms (e.g., Crunchr, Visier, One Model), dashboards must be user-friendly, easy to navigate, and motivate users to work with data in their decision-making. The same applies to functionality based on machine learning models, such as chatbots, learning assistants, or vacancy recommendations. The user design, the functionality provided, and the flawless and timely delivery all contribute to maximising the usage of these analytical services and, ultimately, decision-making. Strong product design and thinking requires product owners to have a marketing mindset As important as the product design is product thinking by the product owner. A product owner for, e.g., recruitment or leadership programs, should be constantly interested in hearing what internal clients think about their products. This behaviour requires product owners to have a marketing mindset. As part of a larger continuous listening program, an internal client feedback mechanism should provide the necessary information to improve your products and services continuously. A product owner should be curious about questions like: Are your internal clients satisfied? Should we tailor the products for different user types? What functionality can we improve or add? Allow yourself to experiment When a solution looks good and makes sense based on your analytics, management tends to go for an immediate big-bang implementation. However, don't be afraid to experiment and learn before rolling out your solution to all possible users. Starting with a minimum viable product (i.e., MVP) allows you to evaluate your product among a select group of users early in the development process. Based on feedback, you can enhance your product incrementally (i.e., agile) manner. It also enables you, when valuable, to compare treatment groups with non-treatment groups. These types of experiments (i.e., difference-in-difference comparisons) help you to evaluate the effect the new product intends to have. People analytics services can support this incremental approach, testing a minimal viable product (MVP) and obtaining feedback to provide additional insights that may avoid a big implementation failure of your new products. Embrace the potential of AI in HR Today, artificial intelligence (AI) is predominantly based on machine learning (ML). These AI-ML models provide powerful functionality such as vacancy and learning recommendations, chatbots, and virtual career or work schedule assistants. There is no need to fear these applications, but having a deeper understanding of them is necessary. However, implementing these types of functionality without checking and validating them is risky and, therefore, unwise. A mature people analytics practice allows you to build your own machine-learning-based AI functionality A mature people analytics practice allows you to create and build these AI functionalities internally. You can also buy AI functionality by implementing a vendor tool, but please ensure you do not end up with a new vendor for each AI functionality you desire. If you choose to buy AI functionality, the people analytics team should act as a gatekeeper. Internally built machine learning models are subject to checks and balances. And rightfully so. However, the same should apply to ML-based AI functionality from external providers. The people analytics team should check the performance and validity of the model and control for biases in the data and legal and ethical justification. The people analytics leader can make the difference If you are the people analytics leader within your organisation, it might be daunting or reassuring to hear that you can make the difference between failure and success. You bring the people analytics practice alive by reaching out to stakeholders, developing your team, understanding your clients, learning from external experts, and building a road map to analytical maturity. A successful people analytics practice starts with the right people analytics leader As a people analytics leader, you should excel in business acumen, influencing skills, strategic thinking, critical and analytical thinking, understanding the HR system landscape, understanding the possibilities of analytical services, project management, and, last but not least, people management (as all leaders should). The result of having all these capabilities is that a people analytics leader, together with the people analytics team, becomes a trusted advisor to senior management, understands the most pressing issues within an organisation, can effectively manage the HR data pipeline, and can build new analytical services to enhance decision-making and ultimately drive organisational performance and employee well-being. I hope you enjoyed my update on the 10 golden rules for establishing people analytics practice. If you enjoyed the post, please hit ? or feel invited to engage and react in the comments. Send me a direct message if you want to schedule a virtual meeting to exchange thoughts one-on-one. Thanks to Jaap Veldkamp for reviewing. 作者 :Patrick Coolen https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/10-golden-rules-establishing-people-analytics-practice-patrick-coolen-85use/
    agile HR
    2024年04月15日