• consumer protection
    LinkedIn因“幽灵职位”遭得州调查,招聘平台真实性与付费模式面临审视 核心概述:LinkedIn因“幽灵职位”问题遭得州总检察长调查。所谓幽灵职位,是指岗位并不存在实际空缺,或企业发布职位后并没有真正填补计划。调查将审查LinkedIn是否在缺乏充分职位核验和风险披露的情况下,以求职机会吸引用户购买Premium Career和Premium Business服务,二者月付价格分别起价39.99美元和69.99美元。得州方面已经发出民事调查要求,索取LinkedIn职位广告、核验机制及相关通信数据。目前调查不代表LinkedIn已经违法,但它将招聘平台的商业责任推到台前:当平台依靠岗位流量、付费曝光和订阅服务获利时,是否有义务确保职位真实有效?对HR而言,长期挂着不招、预算冻结后不撤岗、用正式职位包装人才库需求,都可能成为新的候选人体验与合规风险。 美国得克萨斯州总检察长办公室近日宣布,已对微软旗下职业社交与招聘平台 LinkedIn 展开调查,重点审查其是否通过发布虚假或误导性招聘信息,并向求职者销售付费订阅服务从中获利。 得州总检察长 Ken Paxton 于2026年7月14日表示,此次调查涉及被称为“幽灵职位”(Ghost Jobs)的招聘信息,即相关职位并不存在真实空缺,岗位已经停止招聘,或者雇主虽然发布职位,却没有实际填补岗位的计划。调查目前仍处于取证阶段,并不意味着 LinkedIn 已被认定存在违法行为。 根据得州总检察长办公室披露的信息,LinkedIn 一直将自身定位为帮助求职者寻找就业机会的可信平台,同时向用户提供 Premium Career、Premium Business 等付费服务。调查将重点关注,在部分职位可能不代表真实就业机会的情况下,LinkedIn 是否向付费用户进行了充分披露,以及平台是否采取了合理的职位真实性核验措施。 得州方面已经向 LinkedIn 发出民事调查要求,要求其提交与招聘广告、职位验证机制、用户沟通及相关商业实践有关的文件、数据和内部通信。得州总检察长办公室援引的研究认为,“幽灵职位”可能占在线招聘信息的五分之一至三分之一,这意味着该问题可能并非个别企业的操作失误,而是在线招聘市场长期存在的结构性问题。 “幽灵职位”的形成原因较为复杂。一些企业会在招聘预算尚未批准时提前发布岗位,也有企业通过长期保留职位建立人才库、测试市场供给或展示业务增长形象。部分岗位则已经暂停或完成招聘,但企业招聘系统与外部平台之间没有及时同步,导致职位仍然持续接受申请。 对于求职者而言,每一次申请都意味着简历修改、资料填写、面试准备和时间投入。大量无效职位不仅会降低求职效率,也会加剧候选人的焦虑和挫败感,最终削弱其对招聘平台和企业雇主品牌的信任。 NACSHR认为,此次调查将招聘信息真实性问题进一步推向监管层面。招聘平台不能只以职位数量、用户活跃度和申请流量衡量平台价值,还需要建立更完善的雇主身份验证、岗位有效期、招聘状态更新和过期职位清理机制。 企业HR也应加强招聘职位治理。只有获得明确预算、Headcount批准和招聘计划的岗位,才应被标记为正式开放职位;用于人才储备或未来招聘的职位,应清楚注明“人才社区”或“未来机会”;暂停、冻结或已经完成招聘的岗位,则应及时从ATS和外部招聘平台撤下。 随着招聘越来越依赖数字化平台,职位真实性正在成为候选人体验、雇主品牌和企业合规管理的重要组成部分。LinkedIn调查的最终结果尚未确定,但它已经向招聘行业发出清晰信号:真实、透明和可验证的招聘信息,将成为未来招聘平台与企业必须共同承担的责任。 ——NACSHR 北美华人人力资源协会
    consumer protection
    2026年07月15日
  • consumer protection
    美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)FTC 宣布全国范围内禁止竞业协议,详细请看 美国联邦贸易委员会(FTC)于2024年4月23日发布最终规定,全国范围内禁止非竞争协议。此举旨在通过保护工人更换工作的自由来促进竞争,增加创新,并推动经济增长。根据FTC的预测,新业务的形成将每年增加2.7%,预计每年将新增超过8500家新企业。此外,预计工人的平均收入将增加524美元,未来十年内医疗费用预计将减少高达1940亿美元。同时,预计该规定还将在未来十年内每年新增17000至29000项专利。 详情以英文版为准: FTC Announces Rule Banning Noncompetes FTC’s final rule will generate over 8,500 new businesses each year, raise worker wages, lower health care costs, and boost innovation Today, the Federal Trade Commission issued a final rule to promote competition by banning noncompetes nationwide, protecting the fundamental freedom of workers to change jobs, increasing innovation, and fostering new business formation. “Noncompete clauses keep wages low, suppress new ideas, and rob the American economy of dynamism, including from the more than 8,500 new startups that would be created a year once noncompetes are banned,” said FTC Chair Lina M. Khan. “The FTC’s final rule to ban noncompetes will ensure Americans have the freedom to pursue a new job, start a new business, or bring a new idea to market.” The FTC estimates that the final rule banning noncompetes will lead to new business formation growing by 2.7% per year, resulting in more than 8,500 additional new businesses created each year. The final rule is expected to result in higher earnings for workers, with estimated earnings increasing for the average worker by an additional $524 per year, and it is expected to lower health care costs by up to $194 billion over the next decade. In addition, the final rule is expected to help drive innovation, leading to an estimated average increase of 17,000 to 29,000 more patents each year for the next 10 years under the final rule. Noncompetes are a widespread and often exploitative practice imposing contractual conditions that prevent workers from taking a new job or starting a new business. Noncompetes often force workers to either stay in a job they want to leave or bear other significant harms and costs, such as being forced to switch to a lower-paying field, being forced to relocate, being forced to leave the workforce altogether, or being forced to defend against expensive litigation. An estimated 30 million workers—nearly one in five Americans—are subject to a noncompete. Under the FTC’s new rule, existing noncompetes for the vast majority of workers will no longer be enforceable after the rule’s effective date. Existing noncompetes for senior executives - who represent less than 0.75% of workers - can remain in force under the FTC’s final rule, but employers are banned from entering into or attempting to enforce any new noncompetes, even if they involve senior executives. Employers will be required to provide notice to workers other than senior executives who are bound by an existing noncompete that they will not be enforcing any noncompetes against them. In January 2023, the FTC issued a proposed rule which was subject to a 90-day public comment period. The FTC received more than 26,000 comments on the proposed rule, with over 25,000 comments in support of the FTC’s proposed ban on noncompetes. The comments informed the FTC’s final rulemaking process, with the FTC carefully reviewing each comment and making changes to the proposed rule in response to the public’s feedback. In the final rule, the Commission has determined that it is an unfair method of competition, and therefore a violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act, for employers to enter into noncompetes with workers and to enforce certain noncompetes. The Commission found that noncompetes tend to negatively affect competitive conditions in labor markets by inhibiting efficient matching between workers and employers. The Commission also found that noncompetes tend to negatively affect competitive conditions in product and service markets, inhibiting new business formation and innovation. There is also evidence that noncompetes lead to increased market concentration and higher prices for consumers. Alternatives to Noncompetes The Commission found that employers have several alternatives to noncompetes that still enable firms to protect their investments without having to enforce a noncompete. Trade secret laws and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) both provide employers with well-established means to protect proprietary and other sensitive information. Researchers estimate that over 95% of workers with a noncompete already have an NDA. The Commission also finds that instead of using noncompetes to lock in workers, employers that wish to retain employees can compete on the merits for the worker’s labor services by improving wages and working conditions. Changes from the NPRM Under the final rule, existing noncompetes for senior executives can remain in force. Employers, however, are prohibited from entering into or enforcing new noncompetes with senior executives. The final rule defines senior executives as workers earning more than $151,164 annually and who are in policy-making positions. Additionally, the Commission has eliminated a provision in the proposed rule that would have required employers to legally modify existing noncompetes by formally rescinding them. That change will help to streamline compliance. Instead, under the final rule, employers will simply have to provide notice to workers bound to an existing noncompete that the noncompete agreement will not be enforced against them in the future. To aid employers’ compliance with this requirement, the Commission has included model language in the final rule that employers can use to communicate to workers. The Commission vote to approve the issuance of the final rule was 3-2 with Commissioners Melissa Holyoak and Andrew N. Ferguson voting no. Commissioners’ written statements will follow at a later date. The final rule will become effective 120 days after publication in the Federal Register. Once the rule is effective, market participants can report information about a suspected violation of the rule to the Bureau of Competition by emailing noncompete@ftc.gov. The Federal Trade Commission develops policy initiatives on issues that affect competition, consumers, and the U.S. economy. The FTC will never demand money, make threats, tell you to transfer money, or promise you a prize. Follow the FTC on social media, read consumer alerts and the business blog, and sign up to get the latest FTC news and alerts.  
    consumer protection
    2024年04月23日